CHOW HOW YEEN MARGARET AND OTHERS v. WEX PHARMACEUTICALS INC. AND ANOTHER
The Final Judgment in PRC determining ownership of the China Patent took effect on its date of issue and thereby falsified the CP Representation from that date; Mr Shum knowingly or recklessly concealed that loss and made fraudulent representations (including as to GlobalMed), plaintiffs relied on those representations when entering Distribution Agreements and purchasing shares, and limitation was postponed by deliberate concealment until plaintiffs discovered the fraud on 23 September 2011, so the writ filed 3 April 2013 was timely; plaintiffs entitled to damages, interest and costs as ordered.
- Citation
- CHOW HOW YEEN MARGARET AND OTHERS v. WEX PHARMACEUTICALS INC. AND ANOTHER
- Parties
- 1st Plaintiff: CHOW HOW YEEN MARGARET; 2nd Plaintiff: GAO CHENG (XIE LI) COMPANY LIMITED; 3rd Plaintiff: MUSCULAR INVESTMENT COMPANY LIMITED; 1st Defendant: WEX PHARMACEUTICALS INC.; 2nd Defendant: WEX MEDICAL LIMITED; 1st Third Party: FRANK HAY KONG SHUM; 2nd Third Party: GRACE WAI LAN LEONG
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 13 January 2017
- Case Number
- HCA537/2013
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Fraudulent Misrepresentation Involving Share Purchases and Patent Ownership / Judgment at Court of First Instance (hca 537/2013)
- Outcome
- Judgment for the Plaintiffs
- Legal Topics
- Fraudulent Misrepresentation, Limitation (deliberate Concealment), Damages for Investment Loss, Patent Ownership, Agency and Corporate Representation
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
CHOW HOW YEEN MARGARET
1st Plaintiff
GAO CHENG (XIE LI) COMPANY LIMITED
2nd Plaintiff
MUSCULAR INVESTMENT COMPANY LIMITED
3rd Plaintiff
WEX PHARMACEUTICALS INC.
1st Defendant
WEX MEDICAL LIMITED
2nd Defendant
FRANK HAY KONG SHUM
1st Third Party
GRACE WAI LAN LEONG
2nd Third Party
Procedural Posture
Civil Fraudulent Misrepresentation Involving Share Purchases and Patent Ownership / Judgment at Court of First Instance (hca 537/2013)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether representations were made as to ownership of China Patent and existence/ownership of GlobalMed
- 2 Whether the representations were fraudulent
- 3 Whether a Share Agreement existed
Ratio Decidendi
The Final Judgment in PRC determining ownership of the China Patent took effect on its date of issue and thereby falsified the CP Representation from that date; Mr Shum knowingly or recklessly concealed that loss and made fraudulent representations (including as to GlobalMed), plaintiffs relied on those representations when entering Distribution Agreements and purchasing shares, and limitation was postponed by deliberate concealment until plaintiffs discovered the fraud on 23 September 2011, so the writ filed 3 April 2013 was timely; plaintiffs entitled to damages, interest and costs as ordered.
Court Disposition
Judgment for the Plaintiffs
Orders
- Judgment for the Plaintiffs in the sums of CAD471,882.57, CAD718,993.45 and CAD194,400.00 respectively or their equivalent at time of payment
- On a nisi basis, interest on the judgment sums at judgment rate from the date of respective purchase of the shares to date of payment
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment