CHINA CRUISE LINE LTD AND OTHERS v. STAR YIELD CORPORATION LTD AND ANOTHER
Court found the Defendants had made fraudulent misrepresentations inducing the JV Agreement and the US$1,000,000 Upfront Payment and repudiated the contract by failing to procure the Loan. No rescission had been validly effected by the Plaintiffs, so a constructive trust over the Upfront Payment could not be imposed solely on the basis of fraud prior to rescission; however Plaintiffs were entitled to recover the Upfront Payment by contractual claim against Star Yield with interest and by restitution for unjust enrichment against Lau, and were entitled to declarations transferring the defendant's registered shares back to the Plaintiffs and to an indemnity for losses under the Consulting...
- Citation
- [2021] HKCFI 2970
- Parties
- 1st Plaintiff: China Cruise Line Ltd; 2nd Plaintiff: Fordden International Holdings Company Limited; 3rd Plaintiff: First Choice Investment (HK) Limited; 4th Plaintiff: China International Cruise Development Limited; 1st Defendant: Star Yield Corporation Ltd; 2nd Defendant: Lau Long Ming
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 11 October 2021
- Case Number
- HCA798/2019
- Procedural Posture
- Civil — Contract and Tort (fraud, Restitution, Equity) / Judgment After Trial (court of First Instance)
- Outcome
- Judgment for Plaintiffs on primary claims
- Legal Topics
- Fraudulent Misrepresentation, Constructive Trust, Quistclose Trust, Unjust Enrichment, Rescission, Dishonest Assistance/knowing Receipt, Indemnity, Mareva Injunction
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
China Cruise Line Ltd
1st Plaintiff
Fordden International Holdings Company Limited
2nd Plaintiff
First Choice Investment (HK) Limited
3rd Plaintiff
China International Cruise Development Limited
4th Plaintiff
Star Yield Corporation Ltd
1st Defendant
Lau Long Ming
2nd Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil — Contract and Tort (fraud, Restitution, Equity) / Judgment After Trial (court of First Instance)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Defendants made fraudulent misrepresentations inducing the JV Agreement and Upfront Payment
- 2 Whether Star Yield or Lau hold the Upfront Payment or China International Cruise shares on constructive trust
- 3 Whether the Plaintiffs had validly rescinded the JV Agreement and the consequences of non-rescission
Ratio Decidendi
Court found the Defendants had made fraudulent misrepresentations inducing the JV Agreement and the US$1,000,000 Upfront Payment and repudiated the contract by failing to procure the Loan. No rescission had been validly effected by the Plaintiffs, so a constructive trust over the Upfront Payment could not be imposed solely on the basis of fraud prior to rescission; however Plaintiffs were entitled to recover the Upfront Payment by contractual claim against Star Yield with interest and by restitution for unjust enrichment against Lau, and were entitled to declarations transferring the defendant's registered shares back to the Plaintiffs and to an indemnity for losses under the Consulting...
Court Disposition
Judgment for Plaintiffs on primary claims
Orders
- Declaration that the 1st Defendant holds 4,050 shares of the 4th Plaintiff on trust for and on behalf of the 2nd Plaintiff
- Declaration that the 1st Defendant holds 450 shares of the 4th Plaintiff on trust for and on behalf of the 3rd Plaintiff
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment