CHAN SAI LUN HENRY v. CHAN SAI LUNG, SYLVESTER ANN AND ANOTHER
The 2nd defendant's applications to set aside the decision, to revoke the grant of probate and related summonses were dismissed as wholly without merit and an abuse of the court's process; prior rulings (including Barnett J's solemn grant and Court of Appeal dismissal) rendered the applications untenable and the court imposed restrictions requiring leave for further applications and appeals.
- Citation
- CHAN SAI LUN HENRY v. CHAN SAI LUNG, SYLVESTER ANN AND ANOTHER
- Parties
- Plaintiff (respondent): CHAN SAI LUN, HENRY; 1st Defendant: CHAN SAI LUNG, SYLVESTER; 2nd Defendant (appellant): CHAN WAI WAH, LILY ANN
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 10 November 2000
- Case Number
- HCAP2/1993
- Procedural Posture
- Probate and Related Civil Proceedings (possession/writ; Estate Duty) / Chamber Application to Set Aside Decision and Multiple Summonses and Appeals; Heard in Chambers
- Outcome
- All applications and appeals of the 2nd defendant dismissed as abuse of process with costs awarded to the other parties; further applications and appeals by the 2nd defendant restricted.
- Legal Topics
- Grant of Probate, Abuse of Process, Setting Aside Judgment, Vexatious Litigant, Leave to Apply, Production of Documents, Stay of Execution, Writ of Possession
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
CHAN SAI LUN, HENRY
Plaintiff (respondent)
CHAN SAI LUNG, SYLVESTER
1st Defendant
CHAN WAI WAH, LILY ANN
2nd Defendant (appellant)
Procedural Posture
Probate and Related Civil Proceedings (possession/writ; Estate Duty) / Chamber Application to Set Aside Decision and Multiple Summonses and Appeals; Heard in Chambers
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the decision made in the appellant's absence should be set aside
- 2 Whether the application to revoke the grant of probate had any basis
- 3 Whether the summonses and appeals constituted an abuse of process and delay tactic
Ratio Decidendi
The 2nd defendant's applications to set aside the decision, to revoke the grant of probate and related summonses were dismissed as wholly without merit and an abuse of the court's process; prior rulings (including Barnett J's solemn grant and Court of Appeal dismissal) rendered the applications untenable and the court imposed restrictions requiring leave for further applications and appeals.
Court Disposition
All applications and appeals of the 2nd defendant dismissed as abuse of process with costs awarded to the other parties; further applications and appeals by the 2nd defendant restricted.
Orders
- All applications and appeals of Madam Chan dismissed with costs to the other parties.
- No further application by Madam Chan without the leave of the Master of the High Court.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment