RE LEUNG SIU CHUNG HENRY
The debtors failed to prove any material variation of the Facilities Letter; the alleged conduct was not established and, in any event, clause 3.05 of the Guarantee covered the alleged indulgence/variation so the guarantors were not discharged; expert evidence proffered without leave was inadmissible; trust receipt and overdraft facilities are distinct and any defect in the trust receipt part would not discharge liability for the overdraft; accordingly bankruptcy orders were made against each debtor.
- Citation
- RE LEUNG SIU CHUNG HENRY
- Parties
- Petitioner: Coöperatieve Centrale Raiffeisen Boerenleenbank B.A., Hong Kong Branch trading as Rabobank, Hong Kong Branch; Debtor: Man Kwok Shing; Debtor: Leung Siu Chung Henry; Debtor: Kwan Pak Hin Henry; Official Receiver: Official Receiver
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 26 November 2002
- Case Number
- HCB10379/2002
- Procedural Posture
- Creditor's Bankruptcy Petitions (high Court of Hong Kong) / Judgment (bankruptcy Orders Made; Costs Order Nisi)
- Outcome
- Bankruptcy order made against each debtor; costs awarded to petitioner as order nisi; costs order nisi to become absolute unless contested within 14 days.
- Legal Topics
- Guarantee Discharge, Material Variation of Principal Contract, Trust Receipt, Admissibility of Expert Evidence, Protective Clauses in Guarantees, Statutory Demand
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Coöperatieve Centrale Raiffeisen Boerenleenbank B.A., Hong Kong Branch trading as Rabobank, Hong Kong Branch
Petitioner
Man Kwok Shing
Debtor
Leung Siu Chung Henry
Debtor
Kwan Pak Hin Henry
Debtor
Official Receiver
Official Receiver
Procedural Posture
Creditor's Bankruptcy Petitions (high Court of Hong Kong) / Judgment (bankruptcy Orders Made; Costs Order Nisi)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a material variation of the principal facilities letter occurred such that the guarantors are discharged
- 2 Whether the petitioner's conduct converted secured trust receipt advances into unsecured debt
- 3 Whether clause 3.05 of the Guarantee protects the bank from such variations
Ratio Decidendi
The debtors failed to prove any material variation of the Facilities Letter; the alleged conduct was not established and, in any event, clause 3.05 of the Guarantee covered the alleged indulgence/variation so the guarantors were not discharged; expert evidence proffered without leave was inadmissible; trust receipt and overdraft facilities are distinct and any defect in the trust receipt part would not discharge liability for the overdraft; accordingly bankruptcy orders were made against each debtor.
Court Disposition
Bankruptcy order made against each debtor; costs awarded to petitioner as order nisi; costs order nisi to become absolute unless contested within 14 days.
Orders
- Bankruptcy order made against Man Kwok Shing (HCB10375/2002).
- Bankruptcy order made against Leung Siu Chung Henry (HCB10379/2002).
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment