RE MAINTAIN PROFITS LTD
The Registrar refused the applications to reduce charge-out rates: the Law Society scale remains a valid benchmark and the applicants failed to demonstrate the claimed rates were unreasonable; applying the seven factors and reviewing experience and allocation of work, the Registrar upheld the hourly rates of Mr....
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- RE MAINTAIN PROFITS LTD
- Parties
- Company (in Provisional Liquidation): Maintain Profits Limited; Company (in Provisional Liquidation): Myriad Gold Corporation; Company (in Provisional Liquidation): B.F. Construction Co. Ltd.; Solicitors Instructed by Provisional Liquidators (applicant for Review): Stephenson Harwood & Lo; Controller/related Party: Dr. Chan Shiu Chick; Controller/related Party: Madam Law Wai Duen Nina
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 28 April 2006
- Case Number
- HCCW691/2004
- Procedural Posture
- Companies Winding Up Proceedings / Taxation Review of Solicitors' Bills (decision on Hourly Rates)
- Outcome
- Application for review of charge-out rates refused in respect of the two fee-earners; costs of this review reserved pending decision on other items
- Legal Topics
- Hourly Rates, Law Society Scale, Order 62 Seven Factors, Provisional Liquidation, Solicitors' Fees Taxation
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Maintain Profits Limited
Company (in Provisional Liquidation)
Myriad Gold Corporation
Company (in Provisional Liquidation)
B.F. Construction Co. Ltd.
Company (in Provisional Liquidation)
Stephenson Harwood & Lo
Solicitors Instructed by Provisional Liquidators (applicant for Review)
Dr. Chan Shiu Chick
Controller/related Party
Madam Law Wai Duen Nina
Controller/related Party
Procedural Posture
Companies Winding Up Proceedings / Taxation Review of Solicitors' Bills (decision on Hourly Rates)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the hourly rates claimed by the solicitors exceed reasonable market rates
- 2 Whether the Law Society scale remains the appropriate benchmark
- 3 How Paragraph 2 Part II of the First Schedule to Order 62 (the seven factors) applies to fixing hourly rates in Hong Kong
Ratio Decidendi
The Registrar refused the applications to reduce charge-out rates: the Law Society scale remains a valid benchmark and the applicants failed to demonstrate the claimed rates were unreasonable; applying the seven factors and reviewing experience and allocation of work, the Registrar upheld the hourly rates of Mr. Kemp at HKD 4,200 and Mr. Stranger at HKD 2,100.
Court Disposition
Application for review of charge-out rates refused in respect of the two fee-earners; costs of this review reserved pending decision on other items
Orders
- Application to review hourly rates refused
- Costs of the review reserved until decision on other items in taxation
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment