THE QUEEN v. YICK TIN-WAI

THE QUEEN v. YICK TIN-WAI

The conviction was unsafe and had to be quashed because the magistrate convicted after a crucial uninvestigated assertion that the complainant had failed to identify the appellant at an identification parade, combined with the inherent risks of first identification in the dock.

Citation
THE QUEEN v. YICK TIN-WAI
Parties
Respondent (crown): THE QUEEN; Appellant (defendant): YICK Tin-wai
Court
Court of First Instance
Jurisdiction
Hong Kong
Judgment Date
21 November 1986
Case Number
HCMA918/1986
Procedural Posture
Magistracy Appeal (criminal) / Judgment on Appeal
Outcome
Appeal allowed; conviction quashed
Legal Topics
Identification Evidence, Identification Parade, Unsafe Conviction, Robbery, Appeal Against Conviction
Source Language
EN
Criminal Law Evidence Juvenile Justice Identification Evidence Identification Parade Unsafe Conviction Robbery Appeal Against Conviction

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

THE QUEEN

Respondent (crown)

YICK Tin-wai

Appellant (defendant)

Procedural Posture

Magistracy Appeal (criminal) / Judgment on Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Reliability and weight of in‑court/dock identification
  2. 2 Effect of a failure to identify at an identification parade on subsequent in‑court identification
  3. 3 Duty of the trial magistrate to investigate material assertions undermining identification evidence

Ratio Decidendi

The conviction was unsafe and had to be quashed because the magistrate convicted after a crucial uninvestigated assertion that the complainant had failed to identify the appellant at an identification parade, combined with the inherent risks of first identification in the dock.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed; conviction quashed

Orders

  • Appeal allowed
  • Conviction quashed