TAM MEI KAM v. HSBC INTERNATIONAL TRUSTEE LTD AND OTHERS
The court held that s43E permits an IPO to claim income which the bankrupt is or becomes entitled to during bankruptcy even if entitlement arose before the IPO; the words "during the period for which the order is in force" relate to enforcement of the order not to limit the definition of income in s43E(6). An IPO could therefore claim the accrued maintenance that was suspended, subject to protecting the bankrupt's reasonable domestic needs. The trustees' IPO was therefore not struck out and trustees were not removed.
- Citation
- TAM MEI KAM v. HSBC INTERNATIONAL TRUSTEE LTD AND OTHERS
- Parties
- Applicant / Bankrupt: Tam Mei Kam; 1st Respondent / Executor and Trustee: HSBC International Trustee Limited; 2nd Respondent: Joseph Lo Kin Ching and Derek Lai Kar Yan; 3rd Respondent: New Horizon Buddhist Association Limited; 4th Respondent: Lau Kai Eddie; 5th Respondent / Trustees: Joint and Several Trustees in Bankruptcy of Tam Mei Kam
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 21 February 2014
- Case Number
- HCMP2981/2004
- Procedural Posture
- Bankruptcy Proceedings and Maintenance Proceedings (hcmp 2981/2004; HCB 3777/2011) / Decision on Multiple Applications (heard 11 Feb 2014; Decision 21 Feb 2014)
- Outcome
- Motion to strike out IPO dismissed; IPO allowed; trustees not removed; payment orders made splitting monthly and accrued maintenance; costs orders nisi made against estates as specified.
- Legal Topics
- Income Payments Order, Accrued Maintenance, Removal of Trustees, Reasonable Domestic Needs, Costs
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Tam Mei Kam
Applicant / Bankrupt
HSBC International Trustee Limited
1st Respondent / Executor and Trustee
Joseph Lo Kin Ching and Derek Lai Kar Yan
2nd Respondent
New Horizon Buddhist Association Limited
3rd Respondent
Lau Kai Eddie
4th Respondent
Joint and Several Trustees in Bankruptcy of Tam Mei Kam
5th Respondent / Trustees
Procedural Posture
Bankruptcy Proceedings and Maintenance Proceedings (hcmp 2981/2004; HCB 3777/2011) / Decision on Multiple Applications (heard 11 Feb 2014; Decision 21 Feb 2014)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a trustee may obtain an income payments order (IPO) under s43E of the Bankruptcy Ordinance to claim accrued maintenance and future maintenance payable to a bankrupt during bankruptcy
- 2 Whether income under s43E(6) is limited to income received or becoming due only during the period an IPO is in force
- 3 Whether the IPO application should be struck out for abuse or misconduct by trustees
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that s43E permits an IPO to claim income which the bankrupt is or becomes entitled to during bankruptcy even if entitlement arose before the IPO; the words "during the period for which the order is in force" relate to enforcement of the order not to limit the definition of income in s43E(6). An IPO could therefore claim the accrued maintenance that was suspended, subject to protecting the bankrupt's reasonable domestic needs. The trustees' IPO was therefore not struck out and trustees were not removed.
Court Disposition
Motion to strike out IPO dismissed; IPO allowed; trustees not removed; payment orders made splitting monthly and accrued maintenance; costs orders nisi made against estates as specified.
Orders
- HSBC to pay Madam Tam HK$48,000 per month on first working day of each month (covering domestic needs) commencing 3 March 2014 until her discharge from bankruptcy or further order
- HSBC to pay the balance of monthly maintenance (HK$104,000) to the trustees on same payment day
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment