RE TAM MEI KAM
The court held that an IPO under s43E can claim accrued maintenance and income to which the bankrupt is entitled during bankruptcy even if entitlement arose before the IPO or bankruptcy, provided the income has not been paid out or the bankrupt is not discharged; the trustees' IPO was not struck out and was allowed to claim the bulk of maintenance subject to a deduction for the bankrupt's assessed reasonable domestic needs; the trustees were not removed for misconduct.
- Citation
- RE TAM MEI KAM
- Parties
- Applicant / Bankrupt: Tam Mei Kam; 1st Respondent / Executor and Trustee: HSBC International Trustee Limited; 2nd Respondent: Joseph Lo Kin Ching and Derek Lai Kar Yan; 3rd Respondent: New Horizon Buddhist Association Limited; 4th Respondent: Lau Kai Eddie; 5th Respondent / Trustees in Bankruptcy: Joint and Several Trustees in Bankruptcy of Tam Mei Kam
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 21 February 2014
- Case Number
- HCB3777/2011
- Procedural Posture
- Bankruptcy and Maintenance Proceedings Under Inheritance Law / Chambers Decision on Interlocutory Applications (income Payments Order, Accrued Maintenance, Strike Out and Removal Applications)
- Outcome
- Applications granted in part and dismissed in part: strike out and removal applications dismissed; IPO granted in part; payment orders for monthly and accrued maintenance allocated between bankrupt and trustees; costs ordered nisi.
- Legal Topics
- Income Payments Order (ipo), Section 43 E Bankruptcy Ordinance, Accrued Maintenance, Reasonable Domestic Needs, Removal of Trustees, Costs
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Tam Mei Kam
Applicant / Bankrupt
HSBC International Trustee Limited
1st Respondent / Executor and Trustee
Joseph Lo Kin Ching and Derek Lai Kar Yan
2nd Respondent
New Horizon Buddhist Association Limited
3rd Respondent
Lau Kai Eddie
4th Respondent
Joint and Several Trustees in Bankruptcy of Tam Mei Kam
5th Respondent / Trustees in Bankruptcy
Procedural Posture
Bankruptcy and Maintenance Proceedings Under Inheritance Law / Chambers Decision on Interlocutory Applications (income Payments Order, Accrued Maintenance, Strike Out and Removal Applications)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an income payments order under s43E can claim accrued maintenance and income the bankrupt was entitled to prior to the IPO or bankruptcy
- 2 Whether the trustees' IPO application should be struck out for alleged misconduct or misconstruction of s43E
- 3 Whether the trustees should be removed for alleged dishonesty, recklessness or gross incompetence
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that an IPO under s43E can claim accrued maintenance and income to which the bankrupt is entitled during bankruptcy even if entitlement arose before the IPO or bankruptcy, provided the income has not been paid out or the bankrupt is not discharged; the trustees' IPO was not struck out and was allowed to claim the bulk of maintenance subject to a deduction for the bankrupt's assessed reasonable domestic needs; the trustees were not removed for misconduct.
Court Disposition
Applications granted in part and dismissed in part: strike out and removal applications dismissed; IPO granted in part; payment orders for monthly and accrued maintenance allocated between bankrupt and trustees; costs ordered nisi.
Orders
- Dismissed Madam Tam's application to strike out the trustees' IPO application
- Dismissed Madam Tam's application to remove the trustees
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment