HKSAR v. LAM CHAK SANG ROGER

HKSAR v. LAM CHAK SANG ROGER

The appeal is dismissed because the magistrate's findings and the transcript showed the complainant to be a credible and believable witness, the prosecution's evidence was uncontradicted and capable of proving indecent assault beyond reasonable doubt, and the appellant's failure to give evidence left the allegations unrebutted.

Citation
HKSAR v. LAM CHAK SANG ROGER
Parties
Appellant/defendant: Appellant; Prosecution: Respondent
Court
Court of First Instance
Jurisdiction
Hong Kong
Judgment Date
13 January 2006
Case Number
HCMA602/2005
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal (indecent Assault) / Judgment on Appeal Against Conviction
Outcome
Appeal dismissed; conviction for indecent assault upheld.
Legal Topics
Indecent Assault, Credibility Assessment, Burden of Proof, Right to Silence
Source Language
EN
Criminal Law Sexual Offences Evidence Indecent Assault Credibility Assessment Burden of Proof Right to Silence

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Appellant

Appellant/defendant

Respondent

Prosecution

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal (indecent Assault) / Judgment on Appeal Against Conviction

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the conviction was unsafe given the evidence
  2. 2 Whether the complainant's account was inherently improbable given the room layout
  3. 3 Whether inconsistencies between witnesses undermined credibility

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal is dismissed because the magistrate's findings and the transcript showed the complainant to be a credible and believable witness, the prosecution's evidence was uncontradicted and capable of proving indecent assault beyond reasonable doubt, and the appellant's failure to give evidence left the allegations unrebutted.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed; conviction for indecent assault upheld.

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed
  • Conviction for indecent assault upheld