RE SHEK WAI MAN
The court held that Hong Kong law permits two or more persons to be appointed jointly as nominees and that a person who is not a certified public accountant or solicitor may be appointed a nominee if, on a case‑by‑case assessment, the court is satisfied he has sufficient experience and qualifications to discharge the nominee's duties; accordingly Mr. Wu was fit to be appointed jointly with Ms. Yu for these four IVAs where supervisory duties only were required.
- Citation
- RE SHEK WAI MAN
- Parties
- Debtor/applicant: Shek Wai Man; Debtor/applicant: Wan Fong Hung; Debtor/applicant: Poon Chee Fong; Debtor/applicant: Liu Man Yee; Proposed Nominee: Wu Yan Mo, Wilfred; Proposed Nominee: Yu Tak Yee, Beryl; Official Receiver/amicus Curiae: Official Receiver
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 29 August 2003
- Case Number
- HCBI1026/2003
- Procedural Posture
- Bankruptcy Interim Order Application for Individual Voluntary Arrangements / Hearing on Appointment of Nominee(s); Interim Matters (adjournment of One Hearing to 29 Aug 2003)
- Outcome
- Court declined to object to appointment of Mr. Wu Yan Mo and Ms. Yu Tak Yee as joint nominees for the four individual voluntary arrangements and found appointment of joint nominees permissible under Hong Kong law.
- Legal Topics
- Individual Voluntary Arrangement, Nominee Appointment, Qualification of Insolvency Practitioners, Interpretation of Singular/plural in Statutes
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Shek Wai Man
Debtor/applicant
Wan Fong Hung
Debtor/applicant
Poon Chee Fong
Debtor/applicant
Liu Man Yee
Debtor/applicant
Wu Yan Mo, Wilfred
Proposed Nominee
Yu Tak Yee, Beryl
Proposed Nominee
Official Receiver
Official Receiver/amicus Curiae
Procedural Posture
Bankruptcy Interim Order Application for Individual Voluntary Arrangements / Hearing on Appointment of Nominee(s); Interim Matters (adjournment of One Hearing to 29 Aug 2003)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether two or more persons can be appointed as joint nominees for an individual voluntary arrangement
- 2 Whether Mr. Wu Yan Mo is a suitable person to be appointed as nominee given he is not a certified public accountant or solicitor
- 3 What qualifications and experience the court must require when appointing a nominee
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that Hong Kong law permits two or more persons to be appointed jointly as nominees and that a person who is not a certified public accountant or solicitor may be appointed a nominee if, on a case‑by‑case assessment, the court is satisfied he has sufficient experience and qualifications to discharge the nominee's duties; accordingly Mr. Wu was fit to be appointed jointly with Ms. Yu for these four IVAs where supervisory duties only were required.
Court Disposition
Court declined to object to appointment of Mr. Wu Yan Mo and Ms. Yu Tak Yee as joint nominees for the four individual voluntary arrangements and found appointment of joint nominees permissible under Hong Kong law.
Orders
- No objection to the appointment of Mr. Wu Yan Mo, Wilfred and Ms. Yu Tak Yee, Beryl as joint nominees for HCBI 1026 of 2003, HCBI 1027 of 2003, HCBI 1219 of 2003 and HCBI 1233 of 2003
- HCBI 1027 of 2003 hearing adjourned to 29 August 2003 (by consent) except for the nominee appointment issue which was determined)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment