INCORPORATED OWNERS OF FU NING GARDEN AND ANOTHER v. GRANTWIN DEVELOPMENT LTD.
On the defendants' default the court found the plaintiffs entitled to the permanent injunctive relief and damages claimed; the covenant to pay solicitor and own client costs in the Deed of Mutual Covenant is ancillary to enforcement by the manager, is not a positive covenant for the purposes of s41(6) and thus binds both the registered owner and the tenant; absent exceptional circumstances the court will give effect to the contractual entitlement to costs and accordingly ordered costs to be paid to the plaintiffs to be taxed on an indemnity basis if not agreed.
- Citation
- INCORPORATED OWNERS OF FU NING GARDEN AND ANOTHER v. GRANTWIN DEVELOPMENT LTD.
- Parties
- 1st Plaintiff: Incorporated Owners of Fu Ning Garden; 2nd Plaintiff: Funing Property Management Limited; 1st Defendant: Grantwin Development Limited; 2nd Defendant: Chan Wai Hing
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 28 June 2002
- Case Number
- HCA1747/2002
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Action Property/injunction / Application for Default Judgment and Final Determination on Relief and Costs
- Outcome
- Default judgment entered for the Plaintiffs; permanent injunction granted; damages awarded to be assessed; costs awarded to Plaintiffs on indemnity basis.
- Legal Topics
- Injunction, Default Judgment, Deed of Mutual Covenant, Solicitor and Own Client Costs, Section 41 Conveyancing and Property Ordinance, Indemnity Costs, Positive Vs Negative Covenants
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Incorporated Owners of Fu Ning Garden
1st Plaintiff
Funing Property Management Limited
2nd Plaintiff
Grantwin Development Limited
1st Defendant
Chan Wai Hing
2nd Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Action Property/injunction / Application for Default Judgment and Final Determination on Relief and Costs
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether plaintiffs entitled to permanent injunctive relief and damages on defendants' failure to file defence
- 2 Whether the covenant to pay solicitor and own client costs in the Deed of Mutual Covenant is a positive covenant within the meaning of s41 Conveyancing and Property Ordinance and binds the tenant
- 3 Whether the court should follow the contractual entitlement to solicitor and own client costs or exercise discretion otherwise
Ratio Decidendi
On the defendants' default the court found the plaintiffs entitled to the permanent injunctive relief and damages claimed; the covenant to pay solicitor and own client costs in the Deed of Mutual Covenant is ancillary to enforcement by the manager, is not a positive covenant for the purposes of s41(6) and thus binds both the registered owner and the tenant; absent exceptional circumstances the court will give effect to the contractual entitlement to costs and accordingly ordered costs to be paid to the plaintiffs to be taxed on an indemnity basis if not agreed.
Court Disposition
Default judgment entered for the Plaintiffs; permanent injunction granted; damages awarded to be assessed; costs awarded to Plaintiffs on indemnity basis.
Orders
- Permanent injunction granted in terms of paragraph 1 of the Summons
- Payment of damages in terms of paragraph 2 of the Summons to be assessed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment