CHUN WO CONSTRUCTION & ENGINEERING CO LTD AND ANOTHER v. LOK WAI KEI AND ANOTHER

CHUN WO CONSTRUCTION & ENGINEERING CO LTD AND ANOTHER v. LOK WAI KEI AND ANOTHER

Plaintiffs failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the defendant possessed or had destroyed the documents required by the production orders; the court accepted it was probable she accessed the intranet and may have made notes but that probability did not meet the criminal standard for committal, so the committal motion was dismissed.

Citation
CHUN WO CONSTRUCTION & ENGINEERING CO LTD AND ANOTHER v. LOK WAI KEI AND ANOTHER
Parties
1st Plaintiff: Chun Wo Construction & Engineering Company Limited; 2nd Plaintiff: Chan Chung Fai; 1st Defendant (discontinued): Lok Wai Kei; 2nd Defendant: Kam Fung Ying
Court
Court of First Instance
Jurisdiction
Hong Kong
Judgment Date
8 December 2008
Case Number
HCA235/2007
Procedural Posture
Civil: Breach of Confidence and Committal for Contempt / Hearing and Judgment on Committal Application
Outcome
Motion for committal dismissed
Legal Topics
Injunction, Delivery Up Order, Committal, Service and Orders, Affirmation, Standard of Proof
Source Language
EN

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Chun Wo Construction & Engineering Company Limited

1st Plaintiff

Chan Chung Fai

2nd Plaintiff

Lok Wai Kei

1st Defendant (discontinued)

Kam Fung Ying

2nd Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil: Breach of Confidence and Committal for Contempt / Hearing and Judgment on Committal Application

  1. 1 Whether the defendant possessed or once possessed documents/materials covered by the production order
  2. 2 Whether the plaintiffs proved beyond reasonable doubt that the defendant breached the production orders or destroyed documents
  3. 3 Whether the defendant's account of memorising intranet data is credible in absence of documentary evidence

Ratio Decidendi

Plaintiffs failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the defendant possessed or had destroyed the documents required by the production orders; the court accepted it was probable she accessed the intranet and may have made notes but that probability did not meet the criminal standard for committal, so the committal motion was dismissed.

Court Disposition

Motion for committal dismissed

Orders

  • Committal motion dismissed
  • No order as to costs