CHEN HA PING HEPBURN AND ANOTHER v. CHEN TING SAN DANIEL AND ANOTHER
The applicants established a justified suspicion of wrongful dealing and accounting irregularities; the statutory and common law rights of directors and shareholders to inspect company documents applied, and the respondent failed to prove that inspection would be abused to materially injure the companies; accordingly the applications for production and inspection were allowed.
- Citation
- CHEN HA PING HEPBURN AND ANOTHER v. CHEN TING SAN DANIEL AND ANOTHER
- Parties
- Plaintiff (director and Shareholder): Ms Chen Ha Ping Hepburn; Plaintiff (director and Shareholder): Mr Chen Tsing Kwan; Plaintiff (shareholder): Mr Chen Ting Hoi; 1st Defendant (respondent): Mr Chen Ting San (Daniel); 2nd Defendant (in Person, Absent): 2nd Defendant (unnamed)
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 4 June 2012
- Case Number
- HCMP2062/2011
- Procedural Posture
- Applications for Production and Inspection of Company Documents Under Companies Ordinance / Hearing and Decision on Interlocutory Applications
- Outcome
- Applications for production and inspection of documents allowed
- Legal Topics
- Inspection of Company Documents, Directors' Right of Inspection, Shareholder Inspection Under S152 FA, Alleged Misappropriation and False Accounting, Forensic Accounting Evidence
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ms Chen Ha Ping Hepburn
Plaintiff (director and Shareholder)
Mr Chen Tsing Kwan
Plaintiff (director and Shareholder)
Mr Chen Ting Hoi
Plaintiff (shareholder)
Mr Chen Ting San (Daniel)
1st Defendant (respondent)
2nd Defendant (unnamed)
2nd Defendant (in Person, Absent)
Procedural Posture
Applications for Production and Inspection of Company Documents Under Companies Ordinance / Hearing and Decision on Interlocutory Applications
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether directors and shareholders were entitled to production and inspection of company documents under section 121 and/or section 152FA of the Companies Ordinance
- 2 Whether the applicants acted in bad faith such that inspection should be denied
- 3 Whether inspection would be abused to injure the company or misuse confidential information
Ratio Decidendi
The applicants established a justified suspicion of wrongful dealing and accounting irregularities; the statutory and common law rights of directors and shareholders to inspect company documents applied, and the respondent failed to prove that inspection would be abused to materially injure the companies; accordingly the applications for production and inspection were allowed.
Court Disposition
Applications for production and inspection of documents allowed
Orders
- Production and inspection of the companies' documents granted pursuant to section 121 or alternatively section 152FA of the Companies Ordinance
- Costs awarded to the plaintiffs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment