THE HONG KONG BUDDHIST ASSOCIATION, THE INTERIM ADMINISTRATOR AND MANAGER OF MAN WA TONG (ALSO KNOWN AS MAN WAH TONG) (ALSO KNOWN AS CHUK LAM SIM YUEN), A RELIGIOUS TONG v. JAN FUNG AND OTHERS
The Court found a further nine‑month extension of HKBA's interim appointment was reasonable and necessary to allow completion and court exhibition of the BAO and related tasks, and ordered the extension pegged to the later of nine months or the sanctioning of the BAO; the taxation summons was dismissed because time to commence taxation had not begun to run as the costs order was nisi and relevant appeals and applications remained extant, and costs of that summons were ordered against Jan and Pong and assessed at $5,000.
- Citation
- [2025] HKCFI 3015
- Parties
- Plaintiff (hcmp 496/2017): 釋照月; 1st Defendant (hcmp 496/2017); 3rd Defendant (hca 595/2019): The Secretary for Justice; 2nd Defendant (hcmp 496/2017): The Secretary for Home Affairs; 3rd Defendant (hcmp 496/2017); Plaintiff (hca 595/2019); Interim Administrator: The Hong Kong Buddhist Association; Religious Tong / Party: The Interim Administrator and Manager of Man Wa Tong (Man Wah Tong / Chuk Lam Sim Yuen); 1st Defendant (hca 595/2019): Jan Fung (詹豐); 2nd Defendant (hca 595/2019): Pong Chung Wai (龐宗懷)
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 11 July 2025
- Case Number
- HCA595/2019
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Extension of Interim Management Appointment and Application Concerning Taxation of Costs (hcmp 496/2017; HCA 595/2019) / Hearing and Decision on Extension Summons and Taxation Summons (application Decided by Reasons Dated 11 July 2025)
- Outcome
- Extension of interim appointment granted; taxation summons dismissed; costs orders made
- Legal Topics
- Interim Appointment Extension, Better Administration Order (bao), Taxation of Costs, Nisi Costs Orders, Effect of Pending Appeals on Commencement of Taxation
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
釋照月
Plaintiff (hcmp 496/2017)
The Secretary for Justice
1st Defendant (hcmp 496/2017); 3rd Defendant (hca 595/2019)
The Secretary for Home Affairs
2nd Defendant (hcmp 496/2017)
The Hong Kong Buddhist Association
3rd Defendant (hcmp 496/2017); Plaintiff (hca 595/2019); Interim Administrator
The Interim Administrator and Manager of Man Wa Tong (Man Wah Tong / Chuk Lam Sim Yuen)
Religious Tong / Party
Jan Fung (詹豐)
1st Defendant (hca 595/2019)
Pong Chung Wai (龐宗懷)
2nd Defendant (hca 595/2019)
Procedural Posture
Application for Extension of Interim Management Appointment and Application Concerning Taxation of Costs (hcmp 496/2017; HCA 595/2019) / Hearing and Decision on Extension Summons and Taxation Summons (application Decided by Reasons Dated 11 July 2025)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the interim appointment of HKBA should be extended and for what period
- 2 Whether time has begun to run for commencement of taxation of the Costs Order
- 3 Whether costs should be awarded for the taxation summons and who should bear them
Ratio Decidendi
The Court found a further nine‑month extension of HKBA's interim appointment was reasonable and necessary to allow completion and court exhibition of the BAO and related tasks, and ordered the extension pegged to the later of nine months or the sanctioning of the BAO; the taxation summons was dismissed because time to commence taxation had not begun to run as the costs order was nisi and relevant appeals and applications remained extant, and costs of that summons were ordered against Jan and Pong and assessed at $5,000.
Court Disposition
Extension of interim appointment granted; taxation summons dismissed; costs orders made
Orders
- Appointment of The Hong Kong Buddhist Association as interim administrator and manager of Man Wa Tong extended by nine months 'regardless of whether the appeals in CACV 195/2023 and CACV 196/2023 have been determined or otherwise disposed of or until the BAO is sanctioned by the Court pursuant to paragraph (c) of...
- No order as to costs in relation to the Extension Summons
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment