NG KIN YUEN, Administrator of the estate of LAM TIM STAN also known as LAM TIM alias STAN LAM TIM, deceased v. LAM SIK YING VICTOR AND OTHERS
Where a beneficiary's entitlement is not in dispute, there is demonstrable need and administration has been unreasonably delayed, the court will exercise its power under Trustee Ordinance s34(1) to order an interim distribution limited to that beneficiary provided the distribution is a small fraction of the estate, will not prejudice final determination and costs can be met by the estate.
- Citation
- [2022] HKCFI 1164
- Parties
- Plaintiff/administrator of the Estate of Lam Tim Stan: Ng Kin Yuen; 1st Defendant: Lam Sik Ying Victor; 2nd Defendant: Tang Lam Mo Ching Mary; 3rd Defendant: Lam Mo Lin; 4th Defendant: Shum Chi Wang (lawful attorney of Shum Wai Kuen Sanda, Administrator of the estate of Lam Mo Chun); 5th Defendant: Lam Mo Chu Susie; 6th Defendant: Lam Sik Shi
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 22 July 2021
- Case Number
- HCMP1924/2020
- Procedural Posture
- Trust/probate Application (interim Distribution) / Chambers Hearing and Decision on Interim Distribution Application
- Legal Topics
- Interim Distribution, Trustee Ordinance S34, Administration of Estate, Costs
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ng Kin Yuen
Plaintiff/administrator of the Estate of Lam Tim Stan
Lam Sik Ying Victor
1st Defendant
Tang Lam Mo Ching Mary
2nd Defendant
Lam Mo Lin
3rd Defendant
Shum Chi Wang (lawful attorney of Shum Wai Kuen Sanda, Administrator of the estate of Lam Mo Chun)
4th Defendant
Lam Mo Chu Susie
5th Defendant
Lam Sik Shi
6th Defendant
Procedural Posture
Trust/probate Application (interim Distribution) / Chambers Hearing and Decision on Interim Distribution Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court has jurisdiction under Trustee Ordinance s34(1) to order interim distribution
- 2 Whether entitlement of the 4th defendant to the estate is disputed
- 3 Whether there is need by the beneficiary and undue delay in administration to justify interim distribution
Ratio Decidendi
Where a beneficiary's entitlement is not in dispute, there is demonstrable need and administration has been unreasonably delayed, the court will exercise its power under Trustee Ordinance s34(1) to order an interim distribution limited to that beneficiary provided the distribution is a small fraction of the estate, will not prejudice final determination and costs can be met by the estate.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment