WGL v. ASB

WGL v. ASB

Applying GMO s10(2) with guidance from Re P and related authorities, the court found Father remains a man of very considerable means despite asserted declines, Mother lacks comparable resources, and a broad‑brush budget for the child and primary carer in Hong Kong is reasonable; accordingly the Father must pay periodical maintenance of HK$290,000 per month (index‑linked) from 1 January 2013 with credit for overpayments and a lump sum of HK$3.35m within 14 days; security application adjourned with liberty to restore.

Citation
WGL v. ASB
Parties
Applicant (father): WGL; Respondent (mother): ASB
Court
Court of First Instance
Jurisdiction
Hong Kong
Judgment Date
28 June 2013
Case Number
HCMP489/2013
Procedural Posture
Guardianship of Minors Ordinance Financial Provision / Final Hearing and Judgment (high Court of First Instance)
Outcome
Judgment for the Respondent on financial provision: Father ordered to pay enhanced periodical maintenance and lump sum; costs to Mother.
Legal Topics
Interim Maintenance, Periodical Payments, Lump Sum for Child, Security for Maintenance, Relocation, Disclosure and Valuation, Adjournment
Source Language
EN
Family Law Guardianship of Minors Child Maintenance Trusts International/private Law Interim Maintenance Periodical Payments Lump Sum for Child +4 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 15 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

WGL

Applicant (father)

ASB

Respondent (mother)

Procedural Posture

Guardianship of Minors Ordinance Financial Provision / Final Hearing and Judgment (high Court of First Instance)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether interim maintenance should be varied and quantum of periodical payments for the minor
  2. 2 Appropriate housing provision and associated capital/one-off payments for the child and primary carer
  3. 3 Whether and what lump sums are payable for immediate and non-recurring needs

Ratio Decidendi

Applying GMO s10(2) with guidance from Re P and related authorities, the court found Father remains a man of very considerable means despite asserted declines, Mother lacks comparable resources, and a broad‑brush budget for the child and primary carer in Hong Kong is reasonable; accordingly the Father must pay periodical maintenance of HK$290,000 per month (index‑linked) from 1 January 2013 with credit for overpayments and a lump sum of HK$3.35m within 14 days; security application adjourned with liberty to restore.

Court Disposition

Judgment for the Respondent on financial provision: Father ordered to pay enhanced periodical maintenance and lump sum; costs to Mother.

Orders

  • Father to pay Mother HK$290,000 per month as periodical payments for the benefit of the minor from 1 January 2013, payable on the 1st day of each calendar month until the minor reaches 18 years of age or completes full‑time education, whichever is later
  • Periodical payments to be index‑linked