CROWN HONOR LOGISTICS (HOLDINGS) LTD AND ANOTHER v. SHING KEE WAREHOUSE & DISTRIBUTION (HK) CO LTD AND ANOTHER
The defendants failed to establish the agreement was void (illegality struck out, no evidence government re-entered and issue estoppel applied); the January notice did not defeat plaintiffs' claim because it gave only two months' notice and plaintiffs remain entitled to at least one month's license fee after deposit set-off; on balance of probabilities plaintiffs would recover a substantial sum and the Registrar's interim payment order for one month's license fee was correctly made; appeal dismissed and costs awarded to plaintiffs.
- Citation
- CROWN HONOR LOGISTICS (HOLDINGS) LTD AND ANOTHER v. SHING KEE WAREHOUSE & DISTRIBUTION (HK) CO LTD AND ANOTHER
- Parties
- 1st Plaintiff: CROWN HONOR LOGISTICS (HOLDINGS) LIMITED; 2nd Plaintiff: CHAN CHI WAH; 1st Defendant: SHING KEE WAREHOUSE & DISTRIBUTION (HK) COMPANY LIMITED; 2nd Defendant: KWOK KAI YING ECKI
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 31 May 2011
- Case Number
- HCA26/2010
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal Against Registrar's Interim Payment Order / Judgment on Appeal (decision Affirmed)
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; Registrar's interim payment decision affirmed
- Legal Topics
- Interim Payment, License Agreement, Termination Notice, Illegality, Set Off, Deposit, Contract Interpretation
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
CROWN HONOR LOGISTICS (HOLDINGS) LIMITED
1st Plaintiff
CHAN CHI WAH
2nd Plaintiff
SHING KEE WAREHOUSE & DISTRIBUTION (HK) COMPANY LIMITED
1st Defendant
KWOK KAI YING ECKI
2nd Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal Against Registrar's Interim Payment Order / Judgment on Appeal (decision Affirmed)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the license agreement was void for illegality/public policy
- 2 Whether the defendants gave valid notice of termination
- 3 Whether plaintiffs are entitled to interim payment of one month's license fee despite defenses and counterclaim
Ratio Decidendi
The defendants failed to establish the agreement was void (illegality struck out, no evidence government re-entered and issue estoppel applied); the January notice did not defeat plaintiffs' claim because it gave only two months' notice and plaintiffs remain entitled to at least one month's license fee after deposit set-off; on balance of probabilities plaintiffs would recover a substantial sum and the Registrar's interim payment order for one month's license fee was correctly made; appeal dismissed and costs awarded to plaintiffs.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; Registrar's interim payment decision affirmed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed
- Interim payment of one month's license fees ordered in favour of the plaintiffs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment