RE MADAM L
Section 10D, read in context with s10A and s10B and in light of legislative history, permits the court in appropriate cases to make immediate provision to protect an alleged mentally incapacitated person's property including appointment of a person to act (preferably as an interim receiver rather than a next friend) and to authorise commencement of proceedings to recover misappropriated property pending inquiry; alternatively s21L and the court's inherent jurisdiction supply the same power if a narrow bilingual reading would otherwise preclude it.
- Citation
- RE MADAM L
- Parties
- Applicant/guardian: Director of Social Welfare; Alleged Mentally Incapacitated Person: Madam L; Intervener/authorized to Take Over Proceedings: Official Solicitor; Alleged Recipient/recipient of Entrusted Funds: Mr T; Defendants/registered Proprietors of Property: Purchasers (caretaker and wife)
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 20 October 2004
- Case Number
- HCMP2042/2004
- Procedural Posture
- Application Under Part II Mental Health Ordinance (guardianship and Management of Property) / Interim Relief Granted Pending Inquiry Into Mental Capacity (pre Inquiry Interlocutory Stage)
- Outcome
- Interim directions previously made on 31 August 2004 affirmed and varied: interim protective measures to remain in force pending inquiry; person to be described as interim receiver rather than next friend; Director presently to continue conduct of High Court action with Official Solicitor authorised to take over to...
- Legal Topics
- Interim Relief, Appointment of Interim Receiver, Next Friend Doctrine, Bilingual Statute Interpretation, Power to Commence Litigation on Behalf of Alleged Patient
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Director of Social Welfare
Applicant/guardian
Madam L
Alleged Mentally Incapacitated Person
Official Solicitor
Intervener/authorized to Take Over Proceedings
Mr T
Alleged Recipient/recipient of Entrusted Funds
Purchasers (caretaker and wife)
Defendants/registered Proprietors of Property
Procedural Posture
Application Under Part II Mental Health Ordinance (guardianship and Management of Property) / Interim Relief Granted Pending Inquiry Into Mental Capacity (pre Inquiry Interlocutory Stage)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether s10D of the Mental Health Ordinance authorises interim orders including appointment of a person to commence proceedings on behalf of an alleged mentally incapacitated person prior to determination of incapacity
- 2 Whether appointment should be as next friend under Order 80 or as an interim receiver
- 3 Whether the Chinese version of s10D restricts the section to provision of funds and how to reconcile bilingual texts
Ratio Decidendi
Section 10D, read in context with s10A and s10B and in light of legislative history, permits the court in appropriate cases to make immediate provision to protect an alleged mentally incapacitated person's property including appointment of a person to act (preferably as an interim receiver rather than a next friend) and to authorise commencement of proceedings to recover misappropriated property pending inquiry; alternatively s21L and the court's inherent jurisdiction supply the same power if a narrow bilingual reading would otherwise preclude it.
Court Disposition
Interim directions previously made on 31 August 2004 affirmed and varied: interim protective measures to remain in force pending inquiry; person to be described as interim receiver rather than next friend; Director presently to continue conduct of High Court action with Official Solicitor authorised to take over to...
Orders
- Director of Social Welfare as guardian to issue a protective writ as next friend of Madam L and register it as lis pendens against the specified property (order affirmed subject to variation)
- Official Solicitor authorised to take over and conduct proceedings in the name of or on behalf of Madam L to set aside the assignment dated 6 February 2004
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment