CHINA NATIONAL ARTS AND CRAFTS IMPORT & EXPORT CORPORATION ZHEJIANG BRANCH AND ANOTHER v. SEALAND SERVICE INC. AND OTHERS
The court held that the interrogatories administered by the second defendant need not be answered because they were either irrelevant to the issues defined by the pleadings or improperly aimed at discovering evidential material rather than establishing facts necessary to dispose fairly of the proceedings and save costs; consequently the plaintiffs' application succeeded and an order nisi for costs against the second defendant was made.
- Citation
- CHINA NATIONAL ARTS AND CRAFTS IMPORT & EXPORT CORPORATION ZHEJIANG BRANCH AND ANOTHER v. SEALAND SERVICE INC. AND OTHERS
- Parties
- First Plaintiff: CHINA NATIONAL ARTS AND CRAFTS IMPORT & EXPORT CORPORATION ZHEJIANG BRANCH; Second Plaintiff: JACOB ASH CO. INC; First Defendant: SEALAND SERVICE INC.; Second Defendant: HOI KONG CONTAINER SERVICES CO. LTD.; Third Defendant: FREIGHT-TRANS INTERNATIONAL CO LTD.; First Third Party: FREIGHT-TRANS INTERNATIONAL CO LTD.; Second Third Party: HOI KONG CONTAINER SERVICES CO. LTD.
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 16 December 1998
- Case Number
- HCCL90/1990
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Tort/contract (bailee Duties and Carriage of Goods) / Interlocutory Application: Plaintiffs Seek Withdrawal/variation of Defendant's Interrogatories; Case Management Directions Sought
- Outcome
- Plaintiffs' application granted in full; interrogatories need not be answered; order nisi for costs against the second defendant; case management directions issued.
- Legal Topics
- Interrogatories, Discovery Relevance, Bailee Duties, Title to Goods, Particulars, Costs, Case Management/directions
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
CHINA NATIONAL ARTS AND CRAFTS IMPORT & EXPORT CORPORATION ZHEJIANG BRANCH
First Plaintiff
JACOB ASH CO. INC
Second Plaintiff
SEALAND SERVICE INC.
First Defendant
HOI KONG CONTAINER SERVICES CO. LTD.
Second Defendant
FREIGHT-TRANS INTERNATIONAL CO LTD.
Third Defendant
FREIGHT-TRANS INTERNATIONAL CO LTD.
First Third Party
HOI KONG CONTAINER SERVICES CO. LTD.
Second Third Party
Procedural Posture
Civil Tort/contract (bailee Duties and Carriage of Goods) / Interlocutory Application: Plaintiffs Seek Withdrawal/variation of Defendant's Interrogatories; Case Management Directions Sought
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the interrogatories administered by the second defendant are relevant and must be answered
- 2 Whether interrogatories improperly seek disclosure of evidential material rather than facts necessary to define the issues
- 3 When title to the goods passed and whether interrogatories are necessary to determine which plaintiff has a cause of action
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the interrogatories administered by the second defendant need not be answered because they were either irrelevant to the issues defined by the pleadings or improperly aimed at discovering evidential material rather than establishing facts necessary to dispose fairly of the proceedings and save costs; consequently the plaintiffs' application succeeded and an order nisi for costs against the second defendant was made.
Court Disposition
Plaintiffs' application granted in full; interrogatories need not be answered; order nisi for costs against the second defendant; case management directions issued.
Orders
- None of the interrogatories administered by the second defendant to the plaintiffs shall be answered by the plaintiffs
- There is an order nisi that the second defendant pay the plaintiffs' costs of the application regarding interrogatories
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment