CHENG WAI CHUEN v. TSANG KWAI YAN AND ANOTHER
Where ownership of the vehicle exists and there is no sufficiently clear contrary evidence, the court will infer agency/servant relationship such that it was reasonable for the plaintiff to join the owner; because the police statements did not decisively show the driver acted for her own purposes, the plaintiff's joinder of the owner was reasonable and the court varied the costs order to make the 2nd defendant pay the 1st defendant's costs.
- Citation
- CHENG WAI CHUEN v. TSANG KWAI YAN AND ANOTHER
- Parties
- Plaintiffs: CHENG WAI CHUEN and SO KA HO, the Administrators of the estate of SO CHUN CHUNG, deceased; 1st Defendant: TSANG KWAI YAN; 2nd Defendant: TSANG KA LAI
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 2 December 2005
- Case Number
- HCPI1409/2003
- Procedural Posture
- Personal Injuries / Application to Vary Costs (decision Dated 2 December 2005)
- Outcome
- Order varied in part in favour of the 1st defendant as to costs
- Legal Topics
- Joinder, Vicarious Liability, Agency, Inference From Ownership, Allocation of Costs, Evidence Sufficiency
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
CHENG WAI CHUEN and SO KA HO, the Administrators of the estate of SO CHUN CHUNG, deceased
Plaintiffs
TSANG KWAI YAN
1st Defendant
TSANG KA LAI
2nd Defendant
Procedural Posture
Personal Injuries / Application to Vary Costs (decision Dated 2 December 2005)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether it was reasonable for the plaintiff to join the owner (1st defendant) as a defendant
- 2 Whether an inference that a driver was servant or agent of the owner arises from ownership in absence of other evidence
- 3 Whether the police statements furnished sufficient material to show the driver acted for her own purposes and thus made joinder unreasonable
Ratio Decidendi
Where ownership of the vehicle exists and there is no sufficiently clear contrary evidence, the court will infer agency/servant relationship such that it was reasonable for the plaintiff to join the owner; because the police statements did not decisively show the driver acted for her own purposes, the plaintiff's joinder of the owner was reasonable and the court varied the costs order to make the 2nd defendant pay the 1st defendant's costs.
Court Disposition
Order varied in part in favour of the 1st defendant as to costs
Orders
- The order is varied insofar as it concerns the 1st defendant: the 1st defendant's costs of the action are to be paid by the 2nd defendant.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment