WINGAMES INVESTMENTS LTD AND OTHERS v. MASCOT LAND LTD AND OTHERS
Paragraph 56(2) of the ADC, read in context of the ADC as a whole, did not constitute a clear and unambiguous admission of the Plaintiffs' entitlement to rescission and return of the Rich Base share; accordingly entry of final judgment on that basis was wrong. Leave to amend paragraph 56(2) was properly granted because the admission was not intended, withdrawal would not prejudice the Plaintiffs at the early stage of proceedings, and fairness required permitting correction.
- Citation
- WINGAMES INVESTMENTS LTD AND OTHERS v. MASCOT LAND LTD AND OTHERS
- Parties
- 1st Plaintiff: WINGAMES INVESTMENTS LIMITED; 2nd Plaintiff: CHINA HEALTHCARE HOLDINGS LIMITED; 3rd Plaintiff: CHC INVESTMENT HOLDINGS LIMITED; 1st Defendant: MASCOT LAND LIMITED; 2nd Defendant: CHINA ZHONGFU INDUSTRY CO, LTD; 3rd Defendant: SHANGHAI ZHONGFU INTERNATIONAL TRADING CO, LTD; 4th Defendant: ANHUI ANHE INVESTMENT CONSULTING CO, LTD; 5th Defendant: WANG JISHENG; 6th Defendant: GE QIANSONG
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 14 November 2012
- Case Number
- HCMP32/2012
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal From HCA No 907 of 2011 Concerning Judgment on Admissions and Application to Amend Defence and Counterclaim / Court of Appeal Hearing and Judgment (reasons Handed Down)
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; judgment of Reyes J dated 20 December 2011 set aside; leave granted to Defendants to amend paragraph 56 of the Amended Defence and Counterclaim; costs ordered for Defendants on specified items.
- Legal Topics
- Judgment on Admissions, Amendment of Pleadings, Rescission, Specific Performance, Misrepresentation, Implied Terms, Costs
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
WINGAMES INVESTMENTS LIMITED
1st Plaintiff
CHINA HEALTHCARE HOLDINGS LIMITED
2nd Plaintiff
CHC INVESTMENT HOLDINGS LIMITED
3rd Plaintiff
MASCOT LAND LIMITED
1st Defendant
CHINA ZHONGFU INDUSTRY CO, LTD
2nd Defendant
SHANGHAI ZHONGFU INTERNATIONAL TRADING CO, LTD
3rd Defendant
ANHUI ANHE INVESTMENT CONSULTING CO, LTD
4th Defendant
WANG JISHENG
5th Defendant
GE QIANSONG
6th Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal From HCA No 907 of 2011 Concerning Judgment on Admissions and Application to Amend Defence and Counterclaim / Court of Appeal Hearing and Judgment (reasons Handed Down)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether paragraph 56(2) of the Amended Defence and Counterclaim constituted a clear and unambiguous admission justifying judgment on admissions
- 2 Whether the judge was entitled to enter final judgment on the basis of that alleged admission
- 3 Whether leave should be granted to the Defendants to amend paragraph 56(2) to withdraw or clarify any admission
Ratio Decidendi
Paragraph 56(2) of the ADC, read in context of the ADC as a whole, did not constitute a clear and unambiguous admission of the Plaintiffs' entitlement to rescission and return of the Rich Base share; accordingly entry of final judgment on that basis was wrong. Leave to amend paragraph 56(2) was properly granted because the admission was not intended, withdrawal would not prejudice the Plaintiffs at the early stage of proceedings, and fairness required permitting correction.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; judgment of Reyes J dated 20 December 2011 set aside; leave granted to Defendants to amend paragraph 56 of the Amended Defence and Counterclaim; costs ordered for Defendants on specified items.
Orders
- Set aside the final judgment entered by Reyes J dated 20 December 2011
- Grant leave to the Defendants to amend paragraph 56 of the Amended Defence and Counterclaim in the form proposed below
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment