CHRISTIANE FRANCOISE LEE v. SHAO PING JAMES LEE

CHRISTIANE FRANCOISE LEE v. SHAO PING JAMES LEE

The court accepted the wife’s evidence, rejected the husband’s account, and found the husband’s sustained conduct — withdrawal of cohabitation, threats, withholding maintenance and conduct causing the wife severe nervous depression — amounted to legal cruelty; consequently the husband’s cross-petition for nullity...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
CHRISTIANE FRANCOISE LEE v. SHAO PING JAMES LEE
Parties
Petitioner (wife): Christiane Francoise Lee; Respondent (husband): Shao-ping James Lee
Court
Court of First Instance
Jurisdiction
Hong Kong
Judgment Date
9 August 1972
Case Number
HCA255/1971
Procedural Posture
Divorce / Judicial Separation / Judgment (trial)
Outcome
Decree of judicial separation granted to Petitioner on the ground of cruelty; Respondent’s cross-petition for a declaration that the marriage is null and void for non-consummation dismissed.
Legal Topics
Judicial Separation, Cruelty, Non Consummation / Nullity, Maintenance / Financial Support
Source Language
en
Family Law Matrimonial Law Divorce Law Judicial Separation Cruelty Non Consummation / Nullity Maintenance / Financial Support

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Christiane Francoise Lee

Petitioner (wife)

Shao-ping James Lee

Respondent (husband)

Procedural Posture

Divorce / Judicial Separation / Judgment (trial)

  1. 1 Whether the husband’s conduct constituted cruelty justifying a decree of judicial separation
  2. 2 Whether the husband established that the marriage was null and void for non-consummation due to the wife’s wilful refusal
  3. 3 Credibility of parties and effect of conduct on wife’s health and marital cohabitation

Ratio Decidendi

The court accepted the wife’s evidence, rejected the husband’s account, and found the husband’s sustained conduct — withdrawal of cohabitation, threats, withholding maintenance and conduct causing the wife severe nervous depression — amounted to legal cruelty; consequently the husband’s cross-petition for nullity was refused and a decree of judicial separation was granted to the wife.

Court Disposition

Decree of judicial separation granted to Petitioner on the ground of cruelty; Respondent’s cross-petition for a declaration that the marriage is null and void for non-consummation dismissed.

Orders

  • Decree of judicial separation granted to the Petitioner on the ground that the Respondent treated her with cruelty.
  • Respondent's cross-petition for a declaration of nullity for non-consummation dismissed.