WISE GRACE INVESTMENT LTD AND OTHERS v. LUI MAN DUNG AND OTHERS
On the proper construction of Cap 545 the tribunal must be satisfied of the s4(2) prerequisites before ordering sale; here the applicants met the ownership threshold and, applying the tenantable standard to expert evidence, the buildings' age and state of repair justify redevelopment and applicants took reasonable steps to acquire shares; there is no residual discretion to refuse sale once s4(2) is satisfied; RDV set at $242,000,000; order for sale made and trustees appointed; costs ordered nisi in favour of respondents to be taxed if not agreed.
- Citation
- [2025] HKLdT 5
- Parties
- 1st Applicant: Wise Grace Investment Limited (智喜投資有限公司); 2nd Applicant: Ready Earn Limited (韋迪有限公司); 3rd Applicant: Fortune Motion Limited (聖維有限公司); 1st Respondent: Lui Man Dung (雷文動); 2nd Respondent (discontinued): Lee Ka Leung (李嘉樑); 3rd Respondent: Lam Yip Yick (林業億); 4th Respondent (discontinued): Allen Charles William; 5th Respondent: Liu Ching Heung (廖清香) by guardian ad litem Wong Chung Yam (黃松欽); 6th Respondent (discontinued): Leung Choi Kam (梁彩金); 7th Respondent (discontinued): Belcity International Development Limited (麗拜國際發展有限公司)
- Court
- Lands Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 13 February 2025
- Case Number
- LDCS15000/2021
- Procedural Posture
- Land (compulsory Sale for Redevelopment) Main Application No 15000 of 2021 / Judgment (13 February 2025)
- Outcome
- Application granted; order for compulsory sale made under Cap 545
- Legal Topics
- Land (compulsory Sale for Redevelopment) Ordinance Cap 545, Redevelopment Justification, Age and State of Repair, Reasonable Steps to Acquire, Residual Discretion, Reserve Price and Apportionment, Tenantable Standard
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Wise Grace Investment Limited (智喜投資有限公司)
1st Applicant
Ready Earn Limited (韋迪有限公司)
2nd Applicant
Fortune Motion Limited (聖維有限公司)
3rd Applicant
Lui Man Dung (雷文動)
1st Respondent
Lee Ka Leung (李嘉樑)
2nd Respondent (discontinued)
Lam Yip Yick (林業億)
3rd Respondent
Allen Charles William
4th Respondent (discontinued)
Liu Ching Heung (廖清香) by guardian ad litem Wong Chung Yam (黃松欽)
5th Respondent
Leung Choi Kam (梁彩金)
6th Respondent (discontinued)
Belcity International Development Limited (麗拜國際發展有限公司)
7th Respondent (discontinued)
Procedural Posture
Land (compulsory Sale for Redevelopment) Main Application No 15000 of 2021 / Judgment (13 February 2025)
Legal Issues
- 1 Issue 1: Market value of each property (EUV)
- 2 Issue 2: Whether redevelopment justified by age and/or state of repair (s4(2)(a)(i))
- 3 Issue 3: Whether reasonable steps taken to acquire all undivided shares (s4(2)(b))
Ratio Decidendi
On the proper construction of Cap 545 the tribunal must be satisfied of the s4(2) prerequisites before ordering sale; here the applicants met the ownership threshold and, applying the tenantable standard to expert evidence, the buildings' age and state of repair justify redevelopment and applicants took reasonable steps to acquire shares; there is no residual discretion to refuse sale once s4(2) is satisfied; RDV set at $242,000,000; order for sale made and trustees appointed; costs ordered nisi in favour of respondents to be taxed if not agreed.
Court Disposition
Application granted; order for compulsory sale made under Cap 545
Orders
- All undivided shares in the Lots to be sold by public auction for redevelopment
- Mr Cheung Wood Keung and Ms Pang Shuk Man Eva appointed as trustees to carry out duties under the Ordinance
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment