BONTEX INTERNATIONAL LTD v. KAISER INVESTMENT (GROUP) LTD AND ANOTHER
The court found Bontex proved Kaiser repudiated the Lease by non-payment and surrender of possession; the defendants failed to prove the alleged pre-contract oral misrepresentations and failed to prove the staircase was an unauthorised building structure that deprived quiet enjoyment; Clause 4.16 of the Lease precluded reliance on prior representations and COECO was not properly pleaded or applicable; Kaiser’s counterclaim was struck out for lack of representation and Hiew is liable under his guarantee; judgment awarded HK$5,160,308.26 plus contractual interest and costs order nisi to Bontex.
- Citation
- [2026] HKCFI 117
- Parties
- Plaintiff (original Action); 1st Defendant (counterclaim Defendant): Bontex International Limited; 1st Defendant (original Action); 1st Plaintiff (counterclaim): Kaiser Investment (Group) Limited; 2nd Defendant (original Action); 2nd Plaintiff (counterclaim): Hiew Shek Kei; 2nd Defendant (counterclaim): Wong Sue Toa Stewart; 3rd Defendant (counterclaim): Chow Ka Fung Matthew; 4th Defendant (counterclaim): Paul P.L. Yip
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 7 January 2026
- Case Number
- HCA1560/2021
- Procedural Posture
- Lease Dispute; Landlord Claim for Unpaid Rent and Damages; Tenant Counterclaim (struck Out) / Judgment (trial Concluded)
- Outcome
- Judgment for plaintiff Bontex International Limited; defendants ordered to pay HK$5,160,308.26 with interest and costs order nisi in favour of Bontex; Kaiser’s counterclaim dismissed (struck out) for lack of representation
- Legal Topics
- Lease Termination, Repudiatory Breach, Guarantee Liability, Misrepresentation, Quiet Enjoyment, Unauthorised Building Works, Exclusion/integration Clause (no Warranties Clause), Striking Out for Lack of Representation (order 25 R 1 C), Interest and Costs
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Bontex International Limited
Plaintiff (original Action); 1st Defendant (counterclaim Defendant)
Kaiser Investment (Group) Limited
1st Defendant (original Action); 1st Plaintiff (counterclaim)
Hiew Shek Kei
2nd Defendant (original Action); 2nd Plaintiff (counterclaim)
Wong Sue Toa Stewart
2nd Defendant (counterclaim)
Chow Ka Fung Matthew
3rd Defendant (counterclaim)
Paul P.L. Yip
4th Defendant (counterclaim)
Procedural Posture
Lease Dispute; Landlord Claim for Unpaid Rent and Damages; Tenant Counterclaim (struck Out) / Judgment (trial Concluded)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether alleged oral misrepresentations induced the lease
- 2 Whether the staircase was an unauthorised building structure and breached quiet enjoyment
- 3 Whether Kaiser repudiated the lease and is liable for outstanding rent
Ratio Decidendi
The court found Bontex proved Kaiser repudiated the Lease by non-payment and surrender of possession; the defendants failed to prove the alleged pre-contract oral misrepresentations and failed to prove the staircase was an unauthorised building structure that deprived quiet enjoyment; Clause 4.16 of the Lease precluded reliance on prior representations and COECO was not properly pleaded or applicable; Kaiser’s counterclaim was struck out for lack of representation and Hiew is liable under his guarantee; judgment awarded HK$5,160,308.26 plus contractual interest and costs order nisi to Bontex.
Court Disposition
Judgment for plaintiff Bontex International Limited; defendants ordered to pay HK$5,160,308.26 with interest and costs order nisi in favour of Bontex; Kaiser’s counterclaim dismissed (struck out) for lack of representation
Orders
- Defendants Kaiser Investment (Group) Limited and Hiew Shek Kei to pay Bontex International Limited HK$5,160,308.26
- Interest on that sum at 2% above HSBC best lending rate from 14 November 2021 until date of judgment and thereafter at judgment rate until full payment
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment