蕭楗燊 v. DEVI MADHURI AND ANOTHER
The 1st defendant unilaterally terminated the lease without the plaintiff's consent, is bound by Clause 1 despite not understanding Chinese, and is liable for rent to the end of the fixed term plus unpaid electricity and management fees; deposit is to be applied and deducted to avoid double recovery; counterclaim for harassment and claimed losses from electricity disconnection and other damages are dismissed for lack of credible and corroborating evidence.
- Citation
- [2025] HKDC 843
- Parties
- 1st Plaintiff: 蕭楗燊; 1st Defendant: DEVI MADHURI; 2nd Defendant: VASHISTH. SHATLENDER
- Court
- District Court
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 24 July 2025
- Case Number
- DCCJ4475/2022
- Procedural Posture
- Tenancy Dispute / Judgment at Trial
- Outcome
- Judgment for the plaintiff against 1st defendant for specified sums; counterclaim dismissed; claim against 2nd defendant dismissed previously; no order as to costs.
- Legal Topics
- Lease Termination, Forfeiture of Deposit, Damages for Breach of Lease, Harassment (tort), Withholding Utilities, Pre Judgment and Judgment Interest, Witness Credibility
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
蕭楗燊
1st Plaintiff
DEVI MADHURI
1st Defendant
VASHISTH. SHATLENDER
2nd Defendant
Procedural Posture
Tenancy Dispute / Judgment at Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendant prematurely terminated the tenancy without consent
- 2 Whether the defendant is bound by the termination clause despite not understanding Chinese
- 3 Quantum of rent and other sums payable under the Tenancy Agreement
Ratio Decidendi
The 1st defendant unilaterally terminated the lease without the plaintiff's consent, is bound by Clause 1 despite not understanding Chinese, and is liable for rent to the end of the fixed term plus unpaid electricity and management fees; deposit is to be applied and deducted to avoid double recovery; counterclaim for harassment and claimed losses from electricity disconnection and other damages are dismissed for lack of credible and corroborating evidence.
Court Disposition
Judgment for the plaintiff against 1st defendant for specified sums; counterclaim dismissed; claim against 2nd defendant dismissed previously; no order as to costs.
Orders
- 1st defendant to pay the plaintiff HK$403,340
- Interest on HK$403,340 at judgment rate from date of judgment until payment
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment