盧漢興 v. 長期監禁刑罰覆核委員會 [Decision on Leave Application]

盧漢興 v. 長期監禁刑罰覆核委員會 [Decision on Leave Application]

The court granted leave to apply for judicial review on the papers and directed the parties to liaise and propose jointly agreed directions to enable a substantive hearing; liberty to apply was granted and all questions of costs were reserved.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2024] HKCFI 2351
Court
Court of First Instance
Jurisdiction
Hong Kong
Judgment Date
4 September 2024
Case Number
HCAL1278/2024
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Leave (permission) Granted; Case to Proceed to Directions
Outcome
Leave granted; parties directed to propose jointly agreed directions for a substantive hearing; liberty to apply; costs reserved.
Legal Topics
Leave to Apply, Directions for Substantive Hearing, Service Obligations Following Leave, Costs Reserved
Source Language
en
Administrative Law Judicial Review Leave to Apply Directions for Substantive Hearing Service Obligations Following Leave Costs Reserved

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review / Leave (permission) Granted; Case to Proceed to Directions

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether leave to apply for judicial review should be granted
  2. 2 Whether parties should be ordered to propose jointly agreed directions to lead to a substantive hearing
  3. 3 What procedural steps and timing obligations apply following grant of leave

Ratio Decidendi

The court granted leave to apply for judicial review on the papers and directed the parties to liaise and propose jointly agreed directions to enable a substantive hearing; liberty to apply was granted and all questions of costs were reserved.

Court Disposition

Leave granted; parties directed to propose jointly agreed directions for a substantive hearing; liberty to apply; costs reserved.

Orders

  • Leave to apply for judicial review is granted on the papers.
  • Parties to liaise and propose jointly agreed directions to lead to a substantive hearing (Parties referred to Practice Direction 26.1 paras 8-13).