LIU CHING YUEN v. LIU HAU KAN FUNG

LIU CHING YUEN v. LIU HAU KAN FUNG

Given the totality of undisputed circumstances (timing of grant and will, testator's residence and travel, matching addresses, the defendant's limited denials, and absence of evidence of steps taken on serious allegations), the defendant's denial was found incredible and did not disclose triable issues; summary judgment was therefore entered for the plaintiff limited to the suit property.

Citation
LIU CHING YUEN v. LIU HAU KAN FUNG
Parties
Plaintiff / Sole Executor and Beneficiary: Plaintiff; Defendant / Widow of the Deceased: Defendant; Deceased (testator): Mr Liu
Court
Court of First Instance
Jurisdiction
Hong Kong
Judgment Date
5 December 2013
Case Number
HCAP34/2012
Procedural Posture
Probate / Application to Revoke Letters of Administration and for Grant of Probate (limited to Property); Summary Judgment Application / Summary Judgment Hearing in the High Court (court of First Instance)
Outcome
Summary judgment entered for the plaintiff limited to the suit property; no order made on the defendant's summons of 20 June 2013
Legal Topics
Letter of Administration, Grant of Probate, Summary Judgment, Validity and Execution of Wills, Witnessing of Wills, Legal Professional Privilege
Source Language
EN

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 10 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Plaintiff

Plaintiff / Sole Executor and Beneficiary

Defendant

Defendant / Widow of the Deceased

Mr Liu

Deceased (testator)

Procedural Posture

Probate / Application to Revoke Letters of Administration and for Grant of Probate (limited to Property); Summary Judgment Application / Summary Judgment Hearing in the High Court (court of First Instance)

  1. 1 Whether there are triable issues preventing summary judgment in a probate action
  2. 2 Whether the defendant has an arguable defence to challenge probate limited to the suit property
  3. 3 Whether the correspondence relied on by the plaintiff showing defendant's acquiescence is genuine and binding

Ratio Decidendi

Given the totality of undisputed circumstances (timing of grant and will, testator's residence and travel, matching addresses, the defendant's limited denials, and absence of evidence of steps taken on serious allegations), the defendant's denial was found incredible and did not disclose triable issues; summary judgment was therefore entered for the plaintiff limited to the suit property.

Court Disposition

Summary judgment entered for the plaintiff limited to the suit property; no order made on the defendant's summons of 20 June 2013

Orders

  • Summary judgment entered for the plaintiff limited to the suit property
  • No order made on defendant's summons dated 20 June 2013