YANG MING MARINE TRANSPORT CORPORATION AND ANOTHER v. SHING LEE ENGINEERING CONTAINER CO LTD AND OTHERS
Court found on balance that the letters of indemnity were signed by the 1st Defendant as agent for the 2nd Defendant but without disclosing the principal to the Plaintiffs; under law of undisclosed principal both agent and principal are liable to the contracting third party; the letters were in favour only of the 1st Plaintiff so only the 1st Plaintiff suffered recoverable loss; there was no conversion because possession was obtained with plaintiffs' consent; damages equal the settled sum US$253,655.50 plus interest and costs.
- Citation
- YANG MING MARINE TRANSPORT CORPORATION AND ANOTHER v. SHING LEE ENGINEERING CONTAINER CO LTD AND OTHERS
- Parties
- 1st Plaintiff: YANG MING MARINE TRANSPORT CORPORATION; 2nd Plaintiff: YANG MING LINE (HONG KONG) LIMITED; 1st Defendant: SHING LEE ENGINEERING CONTAINER COMPANY LIMITED; 2nd Defendant / Third Party: STRONGER (H.K.) TRADE LIMITED
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 11 August 2009
- Case Number
- HCA208/2008
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Shipping/contract and Tort (indemnity and Conversion) / Trial Judgment (court of First Instance)
- Outcome
- Judgment for 1st Plaintiff against 1st and 2nd Defendants joint and several for US$253,655.50; 2nd Plaintiff's claim dismissed; Third Party proceedings treated as not pursued and dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Letter of Indemnity, Undisclosed Principal, Conversion, Settlement
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
YANG MING MARINE TRANSPORT CORPORATION
1st Plaintiff
YANG MING LINE (HONG KONG) LIMITED
2nd Plaintiff
SHING LEE ENGINEERING CONTAINER COMPANY LIMITED
1st Defendant
STRONGER (H.K.) TRADE LIMITED
2nd Defendant / Third Party
Procedural Posture
Civil Shipping/contract and Tort (indemnity and Conversion) / Trial Judgment (court of First Instance)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the letters of indemnity were issued by the 1st Defendant as agent for the 2nd Defendant
- 2 Whether the Plaintiffs knew of any agency relationship (i.e. whether the principal was disclosed)
- 3 Whether the 1st and/or 2nd Defendant are liable under the letters of indemnity
Ratio Decidendi
Court found on balance that the letters of indemnity were signed by the 1st Defendant as agent for the 2nd Defendant but without disclosing the principal to the Plaintiffs; under law of undisclosed principal both agent and principal are liable to the contracting third party; the letters were in favour only of the 1st Plaintiff so only the 1st Plaintiff suffered recoverable loss; there was no conversion because possession was obtained with plaintiffs' consent; damages equal the settled sum US$253,655.50 plus interest and costs.
Court Disposition
Judgment for 1st Plaintiff against 1st and 2nd Defendants joint and several for US$253,655.50; 2nd Plaintiff's claim dismissed; Third Party proceedings treated as not pursued and dismissed.
Orders
- 1st and 2nd Defendants to pay 1st Plaintiff US$253,655.50
- Interest on the sum at 1% above the Hongkong and Shanghai Bank prime rate from 8 July 2008 until today and thereafter at judgment rate until payment
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment