STEPHENSON HARWOOD (A FIRM) v. FANG ANKONG aka FANG AN KONG
The court ordered that deponents must attend the Trial for cross-examination and that an absent deponent’s affirmation will be excluded; the Writ Action (including filing of a defence) is stayed pending judgment on the preliminary issue; a one‑day Trial was set with liberty to the defendants to seek more time after filing reply affirmations and list of issues by 25 May 2023. The orders were made because the preliminary issue is final and binding and fairness requires opportunity for oral explanation, balanced against considerations of delay and cost.
- Citation
- [2023] HKCFI 1230
- Parties
- Plaintiff in HCA 191/2023; Defendant in HCMP 1614/2022: Stephenson Harwood (A Firm); Defendant in HCA 191/2023: Fang Ankong (方安空); Plaintiff in HCMP 1614/2022: HWH Holdings Limited
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 5 May 2023
- Case Number
- HCA191/2023
- Procedural Posture
- Civil (fee Dispute; Taxation Application) / Directions Hearing and Preliminary Issues Trial Scheduled (trial of Preliminary Issue)
- Outcome
- Court granted directions: ordered cross-examination attendance, stayed writ action and stayed filing of defence pending judgment on the preliminary issue, set one-day trial with liberty to request more time.
- Legal Topics
- Liability for Legal Fees, Taxation of Costs, Cross Examination on Affidavit, Stay of Proceedings, Preliminary Issues Trial
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Stephenson Harwood (A Firm)
Plaintiff in HCA 191/2023; Defendant in HCMP 1614/2022
Fang Ankong (方安空)
Defendant in HCA 191/2023
HWH Holdings Limited
Plaintiff in HCMP 1614/2022
Procedural Posture
Civil (fee Dispute; Taxation Application) / Directions Hearing and Preliminary Issues Trial Scheduled (trial of Preliminary Issue)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Mr Fang and HWH Holdings Ltd are jointly and severally liable or Mr Fang personally liable for Stephenson Harwood’s bills
- 2 Whether cross-examination of deponents should be ordered for the Trial or absent affirmations excluded
- 3 Whether the Writ Action should be stayed beyond judgment in the Trial and whether a defence should be filed now
Ratio Decidendi
The court ordered that deponents must attend the Trial for cross-examination and that an absent deponent’s affirmation will be excluded; the Writ Action (including filing of a defence) is stayed pending judgment on the preliminary issue; a one‑day Trial was set with liberty to the defendants to seek more time after filing reply affirmations and list of issues by 25 May 2023. The orders were made because the preliminary issue is final and binding and fairness requires opportunity for oral explanation, balanced against considerations of delay and cost.
Court Disposition
Court granted directions: ordered cross-examination attendance, stayed writ action and stayed filing of defence pending judgment on the preliminary issue, set one-day trial with liberty to request more time.
Orders
- Deponents to attend the Trial for the purpose of cross-examination; failing which the absent deponent’s affirmation shall be excluded from the evidence.
- The Writ Action (including the filing of a defence) is stayed pending judgment in the Trial of the preliminary issue.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment