THE JOINT AND SEVERAL LIQUIDATORS OF THE NEW CHINA HONG KONG GROUP LTD AND OTHERS v. ERNST & YOUNG AND OTHERS
The court held that the liquidators had shown a reasonable requirement to inspect E&Y's audit working papers and to orally examine Mr Wu and Miss Yen; E&Y, as auditors and long-standing advisers, fall within the category of officers for s221 purposes; on balancing investigative necessity against oppression the public interest and the liquidators' need prevailed. Production was ordered (limited to available files 1995-1997) and oral examinations ordered before a Master, with costs directions and an undertaking as to reasonable production costs.
- Citation
- THE JOINT AND SEVERAL LIQUIDATORS OF THE NEW CHINA HONG KONG GROUP LTD AND OTHERS v. ERNST & YOUNG AND OTHERS
- Parties
- Applicants (liquidators): The Joint and Several Liquidators of The New China Hong Kong Group Limited, The New China Hong Kong Capital Limited and The New China Hong Kong Finance Limited; 1st Respondent (auditor / Professional Firm): Ernst & Young; 2nd Respondent (individual, Former Director/financial Adviser and E&y Partner): Anthony Wu Ting Yuk; 3rd Respondent (individual, Audit Partner): Catherine Yen
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 28 April 2003
- Case Number
- HCMP3891/2002
- Procedural Posture
- Originating Summons Under Companies Ordinance (s221 and S255) / Chambers Judgment on Originating Summons (decision Handed Down 28 April 2003)
- Outcome
- Application granted in part with modifications
- Legal Topics
- Liquidators' Investigatory Powers Under S221, Production of Audit Working Papers, Oral Examination of Officers, Conflict of Interest of Auditor/financial Adviser, Balancing Reasonable Requirement Against Oppression
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Joint and Several Liquidators of The New China Hong Kong Group Limited, The New China Hong Kong Capital Limited and The New China Hong Kong Finance Limited
Applicants (liquidators)
Ernst & Young
1st Respondent (auditor / Professional Firm)
Anthony Wu Ting Yuk
2nd Respondent (individual, Former Director/financial Adviser and E&y Partner)
Catherine Yen
3rd Respondent (individual, Audit Partner)
Procedural Posture
Originating Summons Under Companies Ordinance (s221 and S255) / Chambers Judgment on Originating Summons (decision Handed Down 28 April 2003)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether E&Y, as auditors, are 'officers' for the purpose of s221
- 2 Whether the liquidators demonstrated that the documents and oral examinations were 'reasonably required' to perform their functions
- 3 Whether the request for wide-ranging audit working papers was an impermissible fishing expedition
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the liquidators had shown a reasonable requirement to inspect E&Y's audit working papers and to orally examine Mr Wu and Miss Yen; E&Y, as auditors and long-standing advisers, fall within the category of officers for s221 purposes; on balancing investigative necessity against oppression the public interest and the liquidators' need prevailed. Production was ordered (limited to available files 1995-1997) and oral examinations ordered before a Master, with costs directions and an undertaking as to reasonable production costs.
Court Disposition
Application granted in part with modifications
Orders
- Ernst & Young ordered to make available to the liquidators all working papers and supporting documents relating to the audits of the Companies for the years ended 31 December 1995 to 31 December 1997 inclusive
- Ernst & Young ordered to make available to the liquidators all documents relating to the provision of financial advice by E&Y and/or Mr Anthony Wu to the Companies and related documents created in that capacity
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment