Re C.A. PACIFIC FINANCE LTD & C.A. PACIFIC SECURITIES LTD
The Court ordered distribution of client shares to proceed upon payment of a provisional processing fee fixed at 14% of the value of each client's portfolio as at the liquidation date, to be held in a separate interest-bearing account pending taxation of legal costs and an independent examination and assessment of the liquidators' remuneration and expenses; the examination is to be conducted by a taxing master with accountancy/insolvency qualifications or by the Court sitting with an assessor under s.53 High Court Ordinance; costs of that examination are to be allocated by the Court at the assessment stage according to the propriety, reasonableness and proportionality of the claims;...
- Citation
- Re C.A. PACIFIC FINANCE LTD & C.A. PACIFIC SECURITIES LTD
- Parties
- Company (in Liquidation): C.A. Pacific Finance Limited (in Liquidation); Company (in Liquidation): C.A. Pacific Securities Limited (in Liquidation); Liquidators / Applicants: The Liquidators; Intervener / Largest Creditor: Securities and Futures Commission; Interested Supervisory Authority: Official Receiver's Office
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 27 November 2001
- Case Number
- HCCW37/1998
- Procedural Posture
- Companies (winding Up) Actions / Decision on Distribution and Assessment of Liquidators' Remuneration (reasons Handed Down 27 November 2001)
- Outcome
- Court directed distribution of shares subject to payment and procedural conditions and ordered independent assessment of liquidators' claims.
- Legal Topics
- Liquidators' Remuneration, Berkeley Applegate Order, Distribution of Trust Assets, Assessment and Taxation of Costs, Allocation and Delivery of Shares, Processing Fee
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
C.A. Pacific Finance Limited (in Liquidation)
Company (in Liquidation)
C.A. Pacific Securities Limited (in Liquidation)
Company (in Liquidation)
The Liquidators
Liquidators / Applicants
Securities and Futures Commission
Intervener / Largest Creditor
Official Receiver's Office
Interested Supervisory Authority
Procedural Posture
Companies (winding Up) Actions / Decision on Distribution and Assessment of Liquidators' Remuneration (reasons Handed Down 27 November 2001)
Legal Issues
- 1 Proper mode of distribution of client shares (sale v delivery)
- 2 Whether a provisional processing fee may be required prior to delivery
- 3 Appropriate level of provisional processing fee
Ratio Decidendi
The Court ordered distribution of client shares to proceed upon payment of a provisional processing fee fixed at 14% of the value of each client's portfolio as at the liquidation date, to be held in a separate interest-bearing account pending taxation of legal costs and an independent examination and assessment of the liquidators' remuneration and expenses; the examination is to be conducted by a taxing master with accountancy/insolvency qualifications or by the Court sitting with an assessor under s.53 High Court Ordinance; costs of that examination are to be allocated by the Court at the assessment stage according to the propriety, reasonableness and proportionality of the claims;...
Court Disposition
Court directed distribution of shares subject to payment and procedural conditions and ordered independent assessment of liquidators' claims.
Orders
- Each client to be permitted delivery of shares only upon payment of a provisional processing fee of 14% of the value of the client's portfolio as at the Value Date.
- Provisional processing fees received to be placed in a separate interest-bearing bank account; Liquidators to report receipts and payments to the Official Receiver and Committees of Inspection at intervals determined by the Official Receiver.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment