RE GOLDLORY RESTAURANT LTD

RE GOLDLORY RESTAURANT LTD

The court held that s196(2) and rule 146(2) afford the court unfettered discretion and that the percentage basis applicable to the Official Receiver is not the default; as a matter of practice the time cost basis should be adopted for remuneration in summary winding-up cases and should be provided for when a summary procedure order under s227F is made.

Citation
RE GOLDLORY RESTAURANT LTD
Parties
Official Receiver: Official Receiver; Liquidators' Firm: Alvarez & Marsal Asia Limited; Liquidators' Firm: Baker Tilly Hong Kong Business Recovery Limited; Liquidators' Firm: Kenny Tam & Co.; Liquidators' Firm: Gallant Y.T. Ho & Co.; Company: DOUBLE MIND COMPANY LIMITED; Company: SOBUN SERVICES LIMITED; Company: REGENT DELTA LIMITED; Company: SUN DENKI (H.K.) COMPANY LIMITED; Company: FU KONG (HOLDINGS) COMPANY LIMITED; Company: APEX COMPUTRONICS COMPANY LIMITED; Company: CHINA GUANGDONG REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT LIMITED; Company: CHAMPION PEAK (GROUP) LIMITED; Company: HARVEST SUMMIT LIMITED; Company: PROFIT FORWARD DEVELOPMENT LIMITED; Company: CORNFIELD INVESTMENT LIMITED; Company: HING WONG ENTERPRISES COMPANY LIMITED; Company: CENTRE OCEAN INVESTMENT LIMITED; Company: MANSION SURVEYORS LIMITED; Company: LUCKY FORTUNE RESTAURANT COMPANY LIMITED; Company: HEADWELL LIMITED; Company: KEENWAY RESOURCES LIMITED; Company: MAJORWORLD LIMITED; Company: ELEGANT GARMENTS & TEXTILES LIMITED; Company: CROWN LUXE DEVELOPMENT LIMITED
Court
Court of First Instance
Jurisdiction
Hong Kong
Judgment Date
7 July 2006
Case Number
HCCW1295/2002
Procedural Posture
Company Winding Up (summary Procedure) / Determination of Legal Issue on Liquidators' Remuneration Basis
Outcome
Issue determined in favour of adopting time cost basis for liquidators in summary winding-up cases; court exercise of discretion confirmed
Legal Topics
Liquidators' Remuneration, Summary Winding Up Procedure, Statutory Interpretation, Panel T Scheme
Source Language
EN

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 10 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 8
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Official Receiver

Official Receiver

Alvarez & Marsal Asia Limited

Liquidators' Firm

Baker Tilly Hong Kong Business Recovery Limited

Liquidators' Firm

Kenny Tam & Co.

Liquidators' Firm

Gallant Y.T. Ho & Co.

Liquidators' Firm

DOUBLE MIND COMPANY LIMITED

Company

SOBUN SERVICES LIMITED

Company

REGENT DELTA LIMITED

Company

SUN DENKI (H.K.) COMPANY LIMITED

Company

FU KONG (HOLDINGS) COMPANY LIMITED

Company

APEX COMPUTRONICS COMPANY LIMITED

Company

CHINA GUANGDONG REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT LIMITED

Company

CHAMPION PEAK (GROUP) LIMITED

Company

HARVEST SUMMIT LIMITED

Company

PROFIT FORWARD DEVELOPMENT LIMITED

Company

CORNFIELD INVESTMENT LIMITED

Company

HING WONG ENTERPRISES COMPANY LIMITED

Company

CENTRE OCEAN INVESTMENT LIMITED

Company

MANSION SURVEYORS LIMITED

Company

LUCKY FORTUNE RESTAURANT COMPANY LIMITED

Company

HEADWELL LIMITED

Company

KEENWAY RESOURCES LIMITED

Company

MAJORWORLD LIMITED

Company

ELEGANT GARMENTS & TEXTILES LIMITED

Company

CROWN LUXE DEVELOPMENT LIMITED

Company

Procedural Posture

Company Winding Up (summary Procedure) / Determination of Legal Issue on Liquidators' Remuneration Basis

  1. 1 Whether remuneration of liquidators appointed under s227F should be fixed on percentage basis or time cost basis
  2. 2 Whether rule 146(2) or Companies (Fees and Percentages) Order establishes a default percentage basis in summary cases
  3. 3 Whether special circumstances must be shown to depart from percentage basis

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that s196(2) and rule 146(2) afford the court unfettered discretion and that the percentage basis applicable to the Official Receiver is not the default; as a matter of practice the time cost basis should be adopted for remuneration in summary winding-up cases and should be provided for when a summary procedure order under s227F is made.

Court Disposition

Issue determined in favour of adopting time cost basis for liquidators in summary winding-up cases; court exercise of discretion confirmed

Orders

  • Time cost basis to be adopted as the basis of remuneration in summary procedure cases and to be provided for upon making the summary procedure order under s227F
  • Costs of the earlier hearing reserved; Official Receiver and participants to inform the court by letter within 7 days what order as to costs they seek