RE GOLDLORY RESTAURANT LTD
The court held that s196(2) and rule 146(2) afford the court unfettered discretion and that the percentage basis applicable to the Official Receiver is not the default; as a matter of practice the time cost basis should be adopted for remuneration in summary winding-up cases and should be provided for when a summary procedure order under s227F is made.
- Citation
- RE GOLDLORY RESTAURANT LTD
- Parties
- Official Receiver: Official Receiver; Liquidators' Firm: Alvarez & Marsal Asia Limited; Liquidators' Firm: Baker Tilly Hong Kong Business Recovery Limited; Liquidators' Firm: Kenny Tam & Co.; Liquidators' Firm: Gallant Y.T. Ho & Co.; Company: DOUBLE MIND COMPANY LIMITED; Company: SOBUN SERVICES LIMITED; Company: REGENT DELTA LIMITED; Company: SUN DENKI (H.K.) COMPANY LIMITED; Company: FU KONG (HOLDINGS) COMPANY LIMITED; Company: APEX COMPUTRONICS COMPANY LIMITED; Company: CHINA GUANGDONG REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT LIMITED; Company: CHAMPION PEAK (GROUP) LIMITED; Company: HARVEST SUMMIT LIMITED; Company: PROFIT FORWARD DEVELOPMENT LIMITED; Company: CORNFIELD INVESTMENT LIMITED; Company: HING WONG ENTERPRISES COMPANY LIMITED; Company: CENTRE OCEAN INVESTMENT LIMITED; Company: MANSION SURVEYORS LIMITED; Company: LUCKY FORTUNE RESTAURANT COMPANY LIMITED; Company: HEADWELL LIMITED; Company: KEENWAY RESOURCES LIMITED; Company: MAJORWORLD LIMITED; Company: ELEGANT GARMENTS & TEXTILES LIMITED; Company: CROWN LUXE DEVELOPMENT LIMITED
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 7 July 2006
- Case Number
- HCCW1295/2002
- Procedural Posture
- Company Winding Up (summary Procedure) / Determination of Legal Issue on Liquidators' Remuneration Basis
- Outcome
- Issue determined in favour of adopting time cost basis for liquidators in summary winding-up cases; court exercise of discretion confirmed
- Legal Topics
- Liquidators' Remuneration, Summary Winding Up Procedure, Statutory Interpretation, Panel T Scheme
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Official Receiver
Official Receiver
Alvarez & Marsal Asia Limited
Liquidators' Firm
Baker Tilly Hong Kong Business Recovery Limited
Liquidators' Firm
Kenny Tam & Co.
Liquidators' Firm
Gallant Y.T. Ho & Co.
Liquidators' Firm
DOUBLE MIND COMPANY LIMITED
Company
SOBUN SERVICES LIMITED
Company
REGENT DELTA LIMITED
Company
SUN DENKI (H.K.) COMPANY LIMITED
Company
FU KONG (HOLDINGS) COMPANY LIMITED
Company
APEX COMPUTRONICS COMPANY LIMITED
Company
CHINA GUANGDONG REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT LIMITED
Company
CHAMPION PEAK (GROUP) LIMITED
Company
HARVEST SUMMIT LIMITED
Company
PROFIT FORWARD DEVELOPMENT LIMITED
Company
CORNFIELD INVESTMENT LIMITED
Company
HING WONG ENTERPRISES COMPANY LIMITED
Company
CENTRE OCEAN INVESTMENT LIMITED
Company
MANSION SURVEYORS LIMITED
Company
LUCKY FORTUNE RESTAURANT COMPANY LIMITED
Company
HEADWELL LIMITED
Company
KEENWAY RESOURCES LIMITED
Company
MAJORWORLD LIMITED
Company
ELEGANT GARMENTS & TEXTILES LIMITED
Company
CROWN LUXE DEVELOPMENT LIMITED
Company
Procedural Posture
Company Winding Up (summary Procedure) / Determination of Legal Issue on Liquidators' Remuneration Basis
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether remuneration of liquidators appointed under s227F should be fixed on percentage basis or time cost basis
- 2 Whether rule 146(2) or Companies (Fees and Percentages) Order establishes a default percentage basis in summary cases
- 3 Whether special circumstances must be shown to depart from percentage basis
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that s196(2) and rule 146(2) afford the court unfettered discretion and that the percentage basis applicable to the Official Receiver is not the default; as a matter of practice the time cost basis should be adopted for remuneration in summary winding-up cases and should be provided for when a summary procedure order under s227F is made.
Court Disposition
Issue determined in favour of adopting time cost basis for liquidators in summary winding-up cases; court exercise of discretion confirmed
Orders
- Time cost basis to be adopted as the basis of remuneration in summary procedure cases and to be provided for upon making the summary procedure order under s227F
- Costs of the earlier hearing reserved; Official Receiver and participants to inform the court by letter within 7 days what order as to costs they seek
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment