LLOYDS BANK INTERNATIONAL LTD AND ANOTHER v. VICTOR FOLCH VERNET AND OTHERS
The court granted the application permitting Mr. Antony Lo and Great Eagle Company Limited to advance funds to meet the guarantee obligations because the proposed loan was a legitimate asset‑preserving manoeuvre, there was no real substance to the plaintiffs' resistance on the urgent facts presented, and counsel's...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- LLOYDS BANK INTERNATIONAL LTD AND ANOTHER v. VICTOR FOLCH VERNET AND OTHERS
- Parties
- 1st Plaintiff: LLOYDS BANK INTERNATIONAL LIMITED; 2nd Plaintiff: LBI FINANCE (HONG KONG) LIMITED; 1st Defendant: VICTOR FOLCH VERNET; 2nd Defendant: STELLA MARIS URIGUEN FOLCH VERNET; 3rd Defendant: HIGH PLATEAU ENTERPRISES LIMITED; 4th Defendant: INMOBILIARIA TIERRA DEL FUEGO S.A.; 5th Defendant: HONG KONG AND SHANGHAI BANKING CORPORATION; 6th Defendant: EDDIE LO MAN PUNG; 7th Defendant: ANTONY LO HONG SUI; 8th Defendant: RICKY LO MAN KIT; 9th Defendant: DAVID LO MAN CHING; 10th Defendant: TOM TONG KAY TAK; 11th Defendant: HILLORY LIMITED
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 29 April 1983
- Case Number
- HCA9151/1982
- Procedural Posture
- Civil (injunction Mareva) / Interlocutory (urgent Application / in Chambers)
- Outcome
- Application by 7th defendant and Great Eagle Company Limited acceded to; court ordered amended draft order as read in chambers.
- Legal Topics
- Mareva Injunction, Guarantor Step in Rights, Urgent Interim Relief, Joint Venture Obligations, Third‑party Funding
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
LLOYDS BANK INTERNATIONAL LIMITED
1st Plaintiff
LBI FINANCE (HONG KONG) LIMITED
2nd Plaintiff
VICTOR FOLCH VERNET
1st Defendant
STELLA MARIS URIGUEN FOLCH VERNET
2nd Defendant
HIGH PLATEAU ENTERPRISES LIMITED
3rd Defendant
INMOBILIARIA TIERRA DEL FUEGO S.A.
4th Defendant
HONG KONG AND SHANGHAI BANKING CORPORATION
5th Defendant
EDDIE LO MAN PUNG
6th Defendant
ANTONY LO HONG SUI
7th Defendant
RICKY LO MAN KIT
8th Defendant
DAVID LO MAN CHING
9th Defendant
TOM TONG KAY TAK
10th Defendant
HILLORY LIMITED
11th Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil (injunction Mareva) / Interlocutory (urgent Application / in Chambers)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether guarantors (and a related investor) may lend funds to a defendant to meet guarantee obligations pending the proceedings
- 2 Whether such proposed loan is a permissible preservation of assets or a device to defeat the plaintiffs' rights
- 3 Whether a demand on the guarantor is a prerequisite to liability such that stepping in before demand creates issues for the plaintiffs
Ratio Decidendi
The court granted the application permitting Mr. Antony Lo and Great Eagle Company Limited to advance funds to meet the guarantee obligations because the proposed loan was a legitimate asset‑preserving manoeuvre, there was no real substance to the plaintiffs' resistance on the urgent facts presented, and counsel's statements were sufficient for an urgent determination subject to remedies if inaccurate.
Court Disposition
Application by 7th defendant and Great Eagle Company Limited acceded to; court ordered amended draft order as read in chambers.
Orders
- Application granted; court to make amended draft order as read by the judge in chambers
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment