EXCEL NOBLE DEVELOPMENT LTD. AND OTHERS v. WAH NAM GROUP LTD. AND OTHERS
Judge found beyond reasonable doubt that the affirmation was three weeks late and did not comply with the Disclosure Order by failing to disclose C1's directly owned assets and unencumbered values as required; therefore Matthew Chan Kwok Choi was in contempt of the Disclosure Order.
- Citation
- EXCEL NOBLE DEVELOPMENT LTD. AND OTHERS v. WAH NAM GROUP LTD. AND OTHERS
- Parties
- 1st Plaintiff: Excel Noble Development Ltd; 2nd Plaintiff: Stamford Star Finance Ltd; 3rd Plaintiff: Unbeatable Assets Ltd; 1st Defendant: Wah Nam Group Ltd; 2nd Defendant: Wah Nam Holdings Co. Ltd; 3rd Defendant: William Chan Pak To; 4th Defendant: Wah Hing Securities Ltd; 1st Contemnor: Wah Nam Group Ltd; 2nd Contemnor: Matthew Chan Kwok Choi
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 20 November 2000
- Case Number
- HCA12439/1999
- Procedural Posture
- Civil: Contempt Application Arising From Disclosure Order and Mareva Injunction / Judgment (finding of Contempt; Sentence Reserved)
- Outcome
- Contempt established against Matthew Chan Kwok Choi; sentencing (imprisonment) reserved for hearing after submissions
- Legal Topics
- Mareva Injunction, Disclosure Order, Committal, Sequestration, Service of Process, Winding Up
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Excel Noble Development Ltd
1st Plaintiff
Stamford Star Finance Ltd
2nd Plaintiff
Unbeatable Assets Ltd
3rd Plaintiff
Wah Nam Group Ltd
1st Defendant
Wah Nam Holdings Co. Ltd
2nd Defendant
William Chan Pak To
3rd Defendant
Wah Hing Securities Ltd
4th Defendant
Wah Nam Group Ltd
1st Contemnor
Matthew Chan Kwok Choi
2nd Contemnor
Procedural Posture
Civil: Contempt Application Arising From Disclosure Order and Mareva Injunction / Judgment (finding of Contempt; Sentence Reserved)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether late filing of the disclosure affirmation constituted contempt of court
- 2 Whether the affirmation's failure to disclose C1's directly owned assets (as opposed to subsidiaries' assets) constituted contempt
- 3 Whether lack of personal service undermined notice required for contempt
Ratio Decidendi
Judge found beyond reasonable doubt that the affirmation was three weeks late and did not comply with the Disclosure Order by failing to disclose C1's directly owned assets and unencumbered values as required; therefore Matthew Chan Kwok Choi was in contempt of the Disclosure Order.
Court Disposition
Contempt established against Matthew Chan Kwok Choi; sentencing (imprisonment) reserved for hearing after submissions
Orders
- Contempt proved against Matthew Chan Kwok Choi; hearing to be convened for sentencing (imprisonment to be considered)
- Leave to dispense with personal service granted under O.45 r.7(7) (as recorded in ruling)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment