HWANG JOON SANG AND ANOTHER v. GOLDEN ELECTRONICS INC. AND OTHERS
The court exercised its discretion under the Hadkinson principle and refused to permit the Defendants to be heard on their Discharge and Stay applications until they complied with the outstanding disclosure orders because the defendants had been in prolonged, contumacious breach without satisfactory excuse, disclosure was necessary to prevent an impediment to justice and there were no adequate alternative protections; a Hadkinson order was granted with a short compliance period.
- Citation
- [2021] HKCFI 1973
- Parties
- 1st Plaintiff: HWANG JOON SANG; 2nd Plaintiff: FUTURE CELL PLUS CO., LTD; 1st Defendant: GOLDEN ELECTRONICS INC.; 2nd Defendant: WORLDBEST GLOBAL SUPPLIER INC.; 3rd Defendant: HARMONY ELECTRONICS INC.; 4th Defendant: QUANTUM ELECTRONICS INC.; 5th Defendant: JIN MIAO INTERNATIONAL LIMITED; 6th Defendant: VIVIEN CHUNG YING-YIN; 7th Defendant: MAGIC ELECTRONICS INC.
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 6 July 2021
- Case Number
- HCA1529/2019
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Proprietary Claims, Fiduciary Duty, Mareva/freezing Injunctions / Interlocutory Applications: Hadkinson Application, Discharge (to Discharge Injunctions) and Stay Summonses Pending; Interlocutory Hearing and Directions
- Outcome
- Hadkinson order granted; Defendants ordered to comply with outstanding disclosure by specified deadline; Discharge and Stay summonses adjourned for hearing; costs reserved.
- Legal Topics
- Mareva Injunction, Proprietary Injunction, Freezing Order, Disclosure Order, Hadkinson Rule, Material Non Disclosure, Tracing, Fiduciary Duties, Unjust Enrichment, Stay of Disclosure
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
HWANG JOON SANG
1st Plaintiff
FUTURE CELL PLUS CO., LTD
2nd Plaintiff
GOLDEN ELECTRONICS INC.
1st Defendant
WORLDBEST GLOBAL SUPPLIER INC.
2nd Defendant
HARMONY ELECTRONICS INC.
3rd Defendant
QUANTUM ELECTRONICS INC.
4th Defendant
JIN MIAO INTERNATIONAL LIMITED
5th Defendant
VIVIEN CHUNG YING-YIN
6th Defendant
MAGIC ELECTRONICS INC.
7th Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Proprietary Claims, Fiduciary Duty, Mareva/freezing Injunctions / Interlocutory Applications: Hadkinson Application, Discharge (to Discharge Injunctions) and Stay Summonses Pending; Interlocutory Hearing and Directions
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether court should refuse to hear discharge/application because defendants are in contempt under Hadkinson
- 2 Whether the exception permitting a contemnor to apply to set aside the order giving rise to contempt applies
- 3 Whether defendants' claimed fear from threatening messages justified long non-compliance
Ratio Decidendi
The court exercised its discretion under the Hadkinson principle and refused to permit the Defendants to be heard on their Discharge and Stay applications until they complied with the outstanding disclosure orders because the defendants had been in prolonged, contumacious breach without satisfactory excuse, disclosure was necessary to prevent an impediment to justice and there were no adequate alternative protections; a Hadkinson order was granted with a short compliance period.
Court Disposition
Hadkinson order granted; Defendants ordered to comply with outstanding disclosure by specified deadline; Discharge and Stay summonses adjourned for hearing; costs reserved.
Orders
- Hadkinson order granted refusing to hear Discharge/Summons until compliance with disclosure orders
- Defendants 1st to 7th to comply with the ancillary disclosure orders by 2 August 2021
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment