TSANG KAY PING ALIAS TSANG TING AND OTHERS v. LO WAI YU AND ANOTHER
On the evidence the 1st defendant was negligent for driving too fast for the prevailing wet/windy conditions causing loss of control; the 2nd defendant as owner is vicariously liable; the plaintiff failed to prove brain damage causally linked to the accident and his credibility was poor, but he proved fractures, lacerations and temporary disability; damages were assessed on that basis and awarded in the sum of $52,700 jointly against the defendants.
- Citation
- TSANG KAY PING ALIAS TSANG TING AND OTHERS v. LO WAI YU AND ANOTHER
- Parties
- 1st Plaintiff: TSANG KAY PING alias TSANG TING; 2nd Plaintiff: TSANG FAT YAM (an infant) by TSANG KAY PING his father and next friend; 1st Defendant: LO WAI YU; 2nd Defendant: YEUNG SHAT LING
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 12 March 1986
- Case Number
- HCA2132/1980
- Procedural Posture
- High Court Personal Injury (motor Vehicle) Action / Trial Judgment (heard Feb 14, 17, 18 1986; Judgment Delivered Mar 12, 1986)
- Outcome
- Judgment for the plaintiffs against the 1st and 2nd defendants (jointly liable)
- Legal Topics
- Negligence, Vicarious Liability of Vehicle Owner, Assessment of Damages for Personal Injury, Medical Causation and Proof, Delay in Prosecution and Revival of Actions, Insurance/motor Insurers Bureau Issues
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
TSANG KAY PING alias TSANG TING
1st Plaintiff
TSANG FAT YAM (an infant) by TSANG KAY PING his father and next friend
2nd Plaintiff
LO WAI YU
1st Defendant
YEUNG SHAT LING
2nd Defendant
Procedural Posture
High Court Personal Injury (motor Vehicle) Action / Trial Judgment (heard Feb 14, 17, 18 1986; Judgment Delivered Mar 12, 1986)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the driver (1st defendant) was negligent in loss of control of the PLB
- 2 Whether the 2nd defendant as owner was vicariously liable for the driver's negligence
- 3 Whether the plaintiff proved brain injury causally connected to the accident
Ratio Decidendi
On the evidence the 1st defendant was negligent for driving too fast for the prevailing wet/windy conditions causing loss of control; the 2nd defendant as owner is vicariously liable; the plaintiff failed to prove brain damage causally linked to the accident and his credibility was poor, but he proved fractures, lacerations and temporary disability; damages were assessed on that basis and awarded in the sum of $52,700 jointly against the defendants.
Court Disposition
Judgment for the plaintiffs against the 1st and 2nd defendants (jointly liable)
Orders
- Judgment entered for plaintiffs against 1st and 2nd defendants for $52,700
- No interest to be awarded (judge's present inclination)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment