YIU TSAN WING v. WONG WAN SING AND OTHERS
On credibility and balance of probabilities the court preferred the Plaintiff and 2nd Defendant's consistent contemporaneous accounts; found the 4th Defendant drove negligently by cutting into the 2nd Defendant's lane causing the accident; found the 3rd Defendant vicariously liable as owner; found no contributory negligence by the Plaintiff or 2nd Defendant; damages to be assessed by a Master.
- Citation
- YIU TSAN WING v. WONG WAN SING AND OTHERS
- Parties
- Plaintiff (hcpi 610/97): Yiu Tsan Wing; 1st Defendant (hcpi 610/97): Wong Wan Sing; 2nd Defendant (hcpi 610/97) / Plaintiff (hcpi 864/97): Lam Ka Yiu; 3rd Defendant (owner of Car) (hcpi 610/97): Fung Lai Chu; 4th Defendant (driver of Car) (hcpi 610/97) / Defendant (hcpi 864/97): Tang Ng Kit
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 14 September 1999
- Case Number
- HCPI864/1997
- Procedural Posture
- Personal Injuries (road Traffic) / Judgment at First Instance (handed Down 14 September 1999)
- Outcome
- Judgment for the Plaintiff(s): liability found against the 4th Defendant (driver) and the 3rd Defendant (owner) in HCPI 610/97 and for the Plaintiff in HCPI 864/97; no contributory negligence found against the Plaintiff or the 2nd Defendant.
- Legal Topics
- Negligence, Contributory Negligence, Causation, Liability of Vehicle Owner, Failure to Stop After Accident, Assessment of Damages, Credibility of Evidence
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Yiu Tsan Wing
Plaintiff (hcpi 610/97)
Wong Wan Sing
1st Defendant (hcpi 610/97)
Lam Ka Yiu
2nd Defendant (hcpi 610/97) / Plaintiff (hcpi 864/97)
Fung Lai Chu
3rd Defendant (owner of Car) (hcpi 610/97)
Tang Ng Kit
4th Defendant (driver of Car) (hcpi 610/97) / Defendant (hcpi 864/97)
Procedural Posture
Personal Injuries (road Traffic) / Judgment at First Instance (handed Down 14 September 1999)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the 4th Defendant was negligent in driving and caused the accident
- 2 Whether the 3rd Defendant is vicariously liable for the 4th Defendant
- 3 Whether the Plaintiff and the 2nd Defendant were guilty of contributory negligence
Ratio Decidendi
On credibility and balance of probabilities the court preferred the Plaintiff and 2nd Defendant's consistent contemporaneous accounts; found the 4th Defendant drove negligently by cutting into the 2nd Defendant's lane causing the accident; found the 3rd Defendant vicariously liable as owner; found no contributory negligence by the Plaintiff or 2nd Defendant; damages to be assessed by a Master.
Court Disposition
Judgment for the Plaintiff(s): liability found against the 4th Defendant (driver) and the 3rd Defendant (owner) in HCPI 610/97 and for the Plaintiff in HCPI 864/97; no contributory negligence found against the Plaintiff or the 2nd Defendant.
Orders
- Judgment on liability for the Plaintiff against the 3rd and 4th Defendants in HCPI 610 of 1997 and for the Plaintiff in HCPI 864 of 1997.
- Damages in each case to be assessed by a Master.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment