TO WEI KEI v. VICKCORE ENGINEERING LTD. AND ANOTHER
The court found on the balance of probabilities that the deceased was an employee of the 1st defendant and that the 1st defendant owned and provided the welding equipment but failed to provide proper secure storage and maintenance; the 2nd defendant as principal contractor owed a non-delegable high duty to ensure safety in dangerous operations and failed to ensure care was taken; there was no contributory negligence by the deceased, therefore both defendants were liable for negligence and damages were assessed accordingly.
- Citation
- TO WEI KEI v. VICKCORE ENGINEERING LTD. AND ANOTHER
- Parties
- Deceased Plaintiff: To Wei Kei; Administrator of Estate (plaintiff): To Siu Keung; Administrator of Estate (plaintiff): Leung Yuk Chun; 1st Defendant (sub Contractor): Vickcore Engineering Limited; 2nd Defendant (principal Contractor): Honest Engineering Limited
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 11 November 2002
- Case Number
- HCPI290/2000
- Procedural Posture
- Personal Injuries Action (employer/contractor Liability) / Judgment on Liability and Quantum Following Trial
- Outcome
- Both 1st and 2nd defendants found liable in negligence; judgment for plaintiff (administrators) on liability and quantum
- Legal Topics
- Negligence, Duty to Provide Safe Equipment, Principal Contractor Non Delegable Duty for Dangerous Operations, Employment Status (employee V Independent Contractor), Contributory Negligence, Assessment of Damages, Credit for Employees' Compensation
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
To Wei Kei
Deceased Plaintiff
To Siu Keung
Administrator of Estate (plaintiff)
Leung Yuk Chun
Administrator of Estate (plaintiff)
Vickcore Engineering Limited
1st Defendant (sub Contractor)
Honest Engineering Limited
2nd Defendant (principal Contractor)
Procedural Posture
Personal Injuries Action (employer/contractor Liability) / Judgment on Liability and Quantum Following Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the deceased was an employee or independent contractor of the 1st defendant
- 2 Who provided the welding equipment
- 3 Whether the equipment had been used or tampered with by others prior to the accident
Ratio Decidendi
The court found on the balance of probabilities that the deceased was an employee of the 1st defendant and that the 1st defendant owned and provided the welding equipment but failed to provide proper secure storage and maintenance; the 2nd defendant as principal contractor owed a non-delegable high duty to ensure safety in dangerous operations and failed to ensure care was taken; there was no contributory negligence by the deceased, therefore both defendants were liable for negligence and damages were assessed accordingly.
Court Disposition
Both 1st and 2nd defendants found liable in negligence; judgment for plaintiff (administrators) on liability and quantum
Orders
- 1st and 2nd defendants to pay damages to the plaintiff in the sum of HKD 1,830,290 subject to credit for employees' compensation awarded/paid in ECC No.304 of 1998 and/or under the Employees' Compensation Ordinance
- Interest on pre-trial losses at half judgment rate from date of accident to date of judgment and thereafter at judgment rate until payment
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment