RAI RANA MAGAR PABITRA AND ANOTHER v. PACIFIC CONSTRUCTION (HK) CO LTD AND OTHERS
The defendants were negligent and in breach of statutory duties (Construction Sites (Safety) Regulations Reg.38A(3) and OSH Ordinance ss.6(1),7) by failing to remove or secure the seat and by failing to ensure the carrier's blind spot was checked; the deceased was contributorily negligent but only to the extent of 25%; damages assessed on the stated heads and calculations produce a judgment for the plaintiffs in the sum of HK$467,721 plus costs nisi and interest to be agreed.
- Citation
- RAI RANA MAGAR PABITRA AND ANOTHER v. PACIFIC CONSTRUCTION (HK) CO LTD AND OTHERS
- Parties
- 1st Plaintiff; Personal Representative of the Estate of Rana Magar Mohan Jung, Deceased: RAI RANA MAGAR PABITRA; 2nd Plaintiff; Personal Representative of the Estate of Rana Magar Mohan Jung, Deceased: RAI RANA MAGAR NAMRATA; 1st Defendant: PACIFIC CONSTRUCTION (HK) CO. LTD.; 2nd Defendant: VSL SWC; 3rd Defendant: GAMMON-SKANSKA-MBEC JOINT VENTURE
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 7 March 2011
- Case Number
- HCPI398/2008
- Procedural Posture
- Personal Injuries Action (fatal Accident) / Judgment (court of First Instance; Judgment Delivered 7 March 2011)
- Outcome
- Judgment for the plaintiffs
- Legal Topics
- Negligence, Contributory Negligence, Breach of Statutory Duty, Assessment of Damages, Apportionment, Workplace Safety Regulations
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
RAI RANA MAGAR PABITRA
1st Plaintiff; Personal Representative of the Estate of Rana Magar Mohan Jung, Deceased
RAI RANA MAGAR NAMRATA
2nd Plaintiff; Personal Representative of the Estate of Rana Magar Mohan Jung, Deceased
PACIFIC CONSTRUCTION (HK) CO. LTD.
1st Defendant
VSL SWC
2nd Defendant
GAMMON-SKANSKA-MBEC JOINT VENTURE
3rd Defendant
Procedural Posture
Personal Injuries Action (fatal Accident) / Judgment (court of First Instance; Judgment Delivered 7 March 2011)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether defendants were negligent in operation and site safety leading to death of worker
- 2 Whether defendants breached statutory duties under Construction Sites (Safety) Regulations and Occupational Safety and Health Ordinance
- 3 Extent of deceased's contributory negligence and appropriate percentage reduction
Ratio Decidendi
The defendants were negligent and in breach of statutory duties (Construction Sites (Safety) Regulations Reg.38A(3) and OSH Ordinance ss.6(1),7) by failing to remove or secure the seat and by failing to ensure the carrier's blind spot was checked; the deceased was contributorily negligent but only to the extent of 25%; damages assessed on the stated heads and calculations produce a judgment for the plaintiffs in the sum of HK$467,721 plus costs nisi and interest to be agreed.
Court Disposition
Judgment for the plaintiffs
Orders
- Judgment for plaintiffs in the sum of HK$467,721
- Costs order nisi in favour of the plaintiffs to be taxed if not agreed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment