WONG WAI SUM AND ANOTHER v. YEUNG SOU WING AND ANOTHER
The court exercised its discretion to allow the majority of the 2nd defendant's proposed amendments because they were relevant to the real issues (causation, duty, exemption clause and discharge of duty), the delay was not inexcusable given long abeyance and the plaintiffs failed to demonstrate uncompensable prejudice, documentary materials (inquest transcripts, investigation reports) could assist and prejudice could be addressed by costs; accordingly leave to amend was granted in part (amended defence as per 4th draft permitted subject to the court's exclusion of the proposed amendment to paragraph 13 as ordered).
- Citation
- WONG WAI SUM AND ANOTHER v. YEUNG SOU WING AND ANOTHER
- Parties
- 1st Plaintiff: WONG WAI SUM (administrator of the estate of WONG CHUN WING TONY, Deceased); 2nd Plaintiff: WONG WAI SUM (administrator of the estate of LI WAI HING, Deceased); 1st Defendant: YEUNG SOU WING (administrator of the estate of LAI YUET WO, Deceased); 2nd Defendant: BROADWAY-NASSAU INVESTMENTS LIMITED
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 26 March 2014
- Case Number
- HCPI388/2000
- Procedural Posture
- Personal Injuries Action / Application for Leave to Amend Defence and Case Management (pre Trial)
- Outcome
- Amendment allowed in part
- Legal Topics
- Negligence, Causation, Amendment of Pleadings, Costs, Contributory Negligence, Deed of Mutual Covenant, Building Management Ordinance, Civil Justice Reform
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
WONG WAI SUM (administrator of the estate of WONG CHUN WING TONY, Deceased)
1st Plaintiff
WONG WAI SUM (administrator of the estate of LI WAI HING, Deceased)
2nd Plaintiff
YEUNG SOU WING (administrator of the estate of LAI YUET WO, Deceased)
1st Defendant
BROADWAY-NASSAU INVESTMENTS LIMITED
2nd Defendant
Procedural Posture
Personal Injuries Action / Application for Leave to Amend Defence and Case Management (pre Trial)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court should allow the 2nd defendant to amend its defence at this late stage
- 2 Whether the proposed amendments raise new issues of causation and whether that causes uncompensable prejudice to plaintiffs
- 3 Whether the 2nd defendant can rely on exemption clause in the Deed of Mutual Covenant and duties under the Building Management Ordinance
Ratio Decidendi
The court exercised its discretion to allow the majority of the 2nd defendant's proposed amendments because they were relevant to the real issues (causation, duty, exemption clause and discharge of duty), the delay was not inexcusable given long abeyance and the plaintiffs failed to demonstrate uncompensable prejudice, documentary materials (inquest transcripts, investigation reports) could assist and prejudice could be addressed by costs; accordingly leave to amend was granted in part (amended defence as per 4th draft permitted subject to the court's exclusion of the proposed amendment to paragraph 13 as ordered).
Court Disposition
Amendment allowed in part
Orders
- Leave granted to the 2nd defendant to file and serve an amended defence as per the 4th draft save and except the proposed amendment to paragraph 13 within 14 days from today
- Leave to the plaintiffs to file and serve a Reply, if so advised, within 28 days thereafter
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment