RE WANG LIANGPING

RE WANG LIANGPING

On unchallenged evidence the bankrupt breached statutory duties under the BO by failing to attend interviews and provide information and by disposition of significant assets to family members; the trustees satisfied the s30AB(1)(a)-(c) requirements; the trustees' delay in applying was not culpable; balancing the factors (serious non-cooperation, asset dispositions, large indebtedness and minimal recoveries) justified granting an extension of time and making a non-commencement order under s30AC; accordingly the court granted the extension and made the NCO and ancillary reliefs and awarded costs.

Citation
[2025] HKCFI 6164
Parties
Petitioner: MADISON PACIFIC TRUST LIMITED; Bankrupt/respondent: WANG LIANGPING (王良平); Applicants/trustees: Mr Chow and Mr Sutton (Joint and Several Trustees)
Court
Court of First Instance
Jurisdiction
Hong Kong
Judgment Date
9 December 2025
Case Number
HCB8393/2020
Procedural Posture
Bankruptcy / Substantive Hearing (application for Non Commencement Order and Alternative Suspension Order)
Outcome
Extension of time granted and non-commencement order made against Wang Liangping
Legal Topics
Non Commencement Order, Suspension Order, Extension of Time, Trustee Duties, Bankrupt Statutory Obligations, Asset Disposition and Recovery
Source Language
EN

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 1 Amounts and remedies 8
Sign in to unlock

Parties

MADISON PACIFIC TRUST LIMITED

Petitioner

WANG LIANGPING (王良平)

Bankrupt/respondent

Mr Chow and Mr Sutton (Joint and Several Trustees)

Applicants/trustees

Procedural Posture

Bankruptcy / Substantive Hearing (application for Non Commencement Order and Alternative Suspension Order)

  1. 1 Whether the trustees are entitled to an extension of time under section 30AB(3) BO to apply for a non-commencement order
  2. 2 Whether a non-commencement order should be made under section 30AC BO against the bankrupt
  3. 3 Alternatively, whether a suspension order under section 30A BO should be made

Ratio Decidendi

On unchallenged evidence the bankrupt breached statutory duties under the BO by failing to attend interviews and provide information and by disposition of significant assets to family members; the trustees satisfied the s30AB(1)(a)-(c) requirements; the trustees' delay in applying was not culpable; balancing the factors (serious non-cooperation, asset dispositions, large indebtedness and minimal recoveries) justified granting an extension of time and making a non-commencement order under s30AC; accordingly the court granted the extension and made the NCO and ancillary reliefs and awarded costs.

Court Disposition

Extension of time granted and non-commencement order made against Wang Liangping

Orders

  • Extension of time for the trustees to apply for a non-commencement order granted
  • Non-commencement order made in terms of §§1-4 of the Summons