CINEPOLY RECORDS CO LTD AND OTHERS v. HONG KONG BROADBAND NETWORK LTD AND OTHERS
The court held that Norwich Pharmacal relief remains available where the information sought is personal data; s58(1)(d) of the PDPO covers tortious conduct including copyright infringement and s58(2) therefore authorizes disclosure where application of Principle 3 would prejudice prevention, preclusion or remedying...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- CINEPOLY RECORDS CO LTD AND OTHERS v. HONG KONG BROADBAND NETWORK LTD AND OTHERS
- Parties
- 1st Plaintiff: Cinepoly Records Company Limited; 2nd Plaintiff: Emperor Entertainment (Hong Kong) Limited; 3rd Plaintiff: Go East Entertainment Company Limited; 4th Plaintiff: Gold Label Entertainment Limited; 5th Plaintiff: Sony BMG Music Entertainment (Hong Kong) Limited; 6th Plaintiff: Universal Music Limited; 7th Plaintiff: Warner Music Hong Kong Limited; 1st Defendant: Hong Kong Broadband Network Limited; 2nd Defendant: Hutchison Global Communications Limited; 3rd Defendant: i-Cable Webserve Limited; 4th Defendant: PCCW IMS Limited
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 26 January 2006
- Case Number
- HCMP2487/2005
- Procedural Posture
- Norwich Pharmacal Discovery Application (miscellaneous Proceedings) / Interlocutory Decision
- Outcome
- Application granted; Norwich Pharmacal order made for limited disclosure of identities associated with specified IP addresses; plaintiffs permitted to use disclosed data only for enforcement of copyrights; costs ordered against plaintiffs in favour of all defendants on an indemnity basis
- Legal Topics
- Norwich Pharmacal Discovery, Copyright Infringement (online/p2 P), Personal Data (privacy) Ordinance Exemptions, Confidentiality Under Telecom Licence, Balance Between Administration of Justice and Privacy
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Cinepoly Records Company Limited
1st Plaintiff
Emperor Entertainment (Hong Kong) Limited
2nd Plaintiff
Go East Entertainment Company Limited
3rd Plaintiff
Gold Label Entertainment Limited
4th Plaintiff
Sony BMG Music Entertainment (Hong Kong) Limited
5th Plaintiff
Universal Music Limited
6th Plaintiff
Warner Music Hong Kong Limited
7th Plaintiff
Hong Kong Broadband Network Limited
1st Defendant
Hutchison Global Communications Limited
2nd Defendant
i-Cable Webserve Limited
3rd Defendant
PCCW IMS Limited
4th Defendant
Procedural Posture
Norwich Pharmacal Discovery Application (miscellaneous Proceedings) / Interlocutory Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Norwich Pharmacal relief is available where the information sought is personal data under the PDPO
- 2 Whether s58(1)(d) of the PDPO covers tortious conduct including copyright infringement
- 3 Whether disclosure would breach Data Protection Principle 3 and therefore be precluded by the PDPO
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that Norwich Pharmacal relief remains available where the information sought is personal data; s58(1)(d) of the PDPO covers tortious conduct including copyright infringement and s58(2) therefore authorizes disclosure where application of Principle 3 would prejudice prevention, preclusion or remedying of that conduct; the plaintiffs proved the Norwich Pharmacal elements and the balance of competing interests favored disclosure; a court order authorizing discovery under equitable jurisdiction constitutes authorization by law that permits disclosure despite licence confidentiality; accordingly the ordered limited disclosure of names, addresses and Hong Kong identity card...
Court Disposition
Application granted; Norwich Pharmacal order made for limited disclosure of identities associated with specified IP addresses; plaintiffs permitted to use disclosed data only for enforcement of copyrights; costs ordered against plaintiffs in favour of all defendants on an indemnity basis
Orders
- 1. 1st Defendant to disclose within 10 days the full names, postal addresses and identity card numbers of persons assigned the IP addresses listed in Annex A on the dates/times indicated (to plaintiffs' solicitors, in documentary form if known or available).
- 2. 2nd Defendant to disclose within 10 days the full names, postal addresses and identity card numbers of persons assigned the IP addresses listed in Annex B on the dates/times indicated (to plaintiffs' solicitors, in documentary form if known or available).
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment