LEUNG TSANG HUNG AND ANOTHER v. TSE YIU PUI AND OTHERS
The 2nd Defendant, as occupier who used and benefited from the unauthorised extended canopy adjoining a busy public highway, owed and breached an absolute duty in nuisance and a duty of care in negligence to maintain the canopy; res ipsa loquitur applies and causation is established by want of repair. The 3rd Defendant (incorporated owners) had no sufficient control over the illegal extended canopy to impose a duty to inspect or repair and is not liable. Contractual allocation of repair between landlord and tenant does not negate the occupier's tortious duty to third parties.
- Citation
- LEUNG TSANG HUNG AND ANOTHER v. TSE YIU PUI AND OTHERS
- Parties
- Plaintiffs: Leung Tsang Hung and Lee Wai Yu (administrators of the estate of Liu Ngan Fong Sukey, deceased); 1st Defendants: Tse Yiu Pui and Ho Lai Bing; 2nd Defendant: Chan Kwok Chi; 3rd Defendant: The Incorporated Owners of Kwok Wing House
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 12 May 2004
- Case Number
- HCPI595/2002
- Procedural Posture
- Personal Injuries (fatal Accidents Ordinance) / Judgment at First Instance (court of First Instance)
- Outcome
- Judgment for Plaintiffs against 1st and 2nd Defendants; claim against 3rd Defendant dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Occupier's Liability, Duty to Repair, Res Ipsa Loquitur, Latent Defects, Deed of Mutual Covenant, Assessment of Damages
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Leung Tsang Hung and Lee Wai Yu (administrators of the estate of Liu Ngan Fong Sukey, deceased)
Plaintiffs
Tse Yiu Pui and Ho Lai Bing
1st Defendants
Chan Kwok Chi
2nd Defendant
The Incorporated Owners of Kwok Wing House
3rd Defendant
Procedural Posture
Personal Injuries (fatal Accidents Ordinance) / Judgment at First Instance (court of First Instance)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether occupier/owner/manager owed duty to repair or inspect the unauthorised extended canopy
- 2 Whether the defendant(s) breached any duty to repair or inspect
- 3 Causation of collapse and applicability of res ipsa loquitur
Ratio Decidendi
The 2nd Defendant, as occupier who used and benefited from the unauthorised extended canopy adjoining a busy public highway, owed and breached an absolute duty in nuisance and a duty of care in negligence to maintain the canopy; res ipsa loquitur applies and causation is established by want of repair. The 3rd Defendant (incorporated owners) had no sufficient control over the illegal extended canopy to impose a duty to inspect or repair and is not liable. Contractual allocation of repair between landlord and tenant does not negate the occupier's tortious duty to third parties.
Court Disposition
Judgment for Plaintiffs against 1st and 2nd Defendants; claim against 3rd Defendant dismissed
Orders
- Judgment for Plaintiffs for HKD 1,554,742.00 against the 1st and 2nd Defendants
- Plaintiffs' claim against the 3rd Defendant dismissed with costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment