RE BONDWOOD DEVELOPMENT LTD.
The court found on the balance of probabilities that Mr. Fung had excluded other shareholders, failed to produce proper accounts, diverted substantial sums to related companies and acted fraudulently; his conduct amounted to oppression under s.168A. The court granted injunctive relief restraining Mr. Fung and his companies from managing Bondwood, ordered discovery and tracing of related companies' records, appointed two independent managers (Daniel Kwok and Lawrance Chung) to run and reconstruct the business and entertain claims for rectification of the share register, and awarded costs personally against Mr. Fung on a common fund basis.
- Citation
- RE BONDWOOD DEVELOPMENT LTD.
- Parties
- Petitioner: Mutual Power Ltd.; Petitioner: Mutualbest Ltd.; Petitioner: Trade Empire Ltd.; Respondent (company): Bondwood Development Limited (No.224903); Respondent (de Facto Controller): Anthony T.S. Fung (Fung Tak Shing)
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 15 November 1989
- Case Number
- HCMP1100/1989
- Procedural Posture
- Section 168 a Petition (companies Ordinance Cap.32) / Final Judgment (high Court)
- Outcome
- Petition granted in part: injunctions and managerial and discovery relief granted; costs awarded against Mr. Fung personally
- Legal Topics
- Oppression of Minority Shareholders, Appointment of Manager/receiver, Discovery and Tracing of Assets, Rectification of Share Register, Costs on Common Fund Basis
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mutual Power Ltd.
Petitioner
Mutualbest Ltd.
Petitioner
Trade Empire Ltd.
Petitioner
Bondwood Development Limited (No.224903)
Respondent (company)
Anthony T.S. Fung (Fung Tak Shing)
Respondent (de Facto Controller)
Procedural Posture
Section 168 a Petition (companies Ordinance Cap.32) / Final Judgment (high Court)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether conduct of Mr. Fung constituted oppression under s.168A
- 2 Whether alleged share subscriptions by petitioners were paid and should be reflected on register
- 3 Whether capitalisation had been fraudulently increased and assets diverted to related companies
Ratio Decidendi
The court found on the balance of probabilities that Mr. Fung had excluded other shareholders, failed to produce proper accounts, diverted substantial sums to related companies and acted fraudulently; his conduct amounted to oppression under s.168A. The court granted injunctive relief restraining Mr. Fung and his companies from managing Bondwood, ordered discovery and tracing of related companies' records, appointed two independent managers (Daniel Kwok and Lawrance Chung) to run and reconstruct the business and entertain claims for rectification of the share register, and awarded costs personally against Mr. Fung on a common fund basis.
Court Disposition
Petition granted in part: injunctions and managerial and discovery relief granted; costs awarded against Mr. Fung personally
Orders
- Injunction restraining Mr. Fung and companies he controls from exercising any role in the management or affairs of Bondwood Development Ltd.
- Appointment of Mr. Daniel Kwok and Mr. Lawrance Chung (public accountants) as managers to manage the affairs of the company and to have full access to records.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment