BRIGHTFORD LTD. v. MAK KEE LTD. AND ANOTHER
The Master's summary judgment was set aside and conditional leave to defend was granted because, although the defendant raised potentially triable issues, those defences were late, inadequately supported by contemporaneous evidence and in some respects shadowy; fairness required preserving the defendant's right to trial only upon payment into court of the Hong Kong dollar equivalent of JPY 42,560,000 (as determined by HSBC mid-market rate on the date of judgment) within 30 days or by providing security to a Master's satisfaction.
- Citation
- BRIGHTFORD LTD. v. MAK KEE LTD. AND ANOTHER
- Parties
- Plaintiff (hca 9630/1999): Tadano South China Company Limited; 1st Defendant (hca 9630/1999) / Plaintiff (hca 16180/1998) (consolidated): Brightford Limited; 2nd Defendant (hca 9630/1999): Lam Chi Biu; 1st Defendant (hca 16180/1998): Mak Kee Limited; 2nd Defendant (hca 16180/1998): Shenzhen Mak Kee Machinery Company Limited
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 11 April 2006
- Case Number
- HCA16180/1998
- Procedural Posture
- Civil — Contract/guarantee Enforcement (summary Judgment Application) / Rehearing of Order 14 RHC Summary Judgment Application in Chambers Following Master's Order
- Outcome
- Master's order of 5 December 2005 set aside; conditional leave to defend granted subject to payment into court or provision of security; liberty to apply; costs reserved (nisi) with specific costs directions.
- Legal Topics
- Order 14 RHC, Summary Judgment, Guarantee Enforcement, Undue Influence and Duress, Misrepresentation, Estoppel, Consideration, Delay and Interlocutory Relief, Security for Costs/payment Into Court
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Tadano South China Company Limited
Plaintiff (hca 9630/1999)
Brightford Limited
1st Defendant (hca 9630/1999) / Plaintiff (hca 16180/1998) (consolidated)
Lam Chi Biu
2nd Defendant (hca 9630/1999)
Mak Kee Limited
1st Defendant (hca 16180/1998)
Shenzhen Mak Kee Machinery Company Limited
2nd Defendant (hca 16180/1998)
Procedural Posture
Civil — Contract/guarantee Enforcement (summary Judgment Application) / Rehearing of Order 14 RHC Summary Judgment Application in Chambers Following Master's Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the guarantor's signature gave rise to an enforceable guarantee requiring summary judgment
- 2 Whether the defendant raised triable issues (misrepresentation, undue influence/duress, forgery, estoppel, want of consideration) sufficient to defeat an Order 14 application
- 3 Whether prior proceedings and conduct constituted demand for payment
Ratio Decidendi
The Master's summary judgment was set aside and conditional leave to defend was granted because, although the defendant raised potentially triable issues, those defences were late, inadequately supported by contemporaneous evidence and in some respects shadowy; fairness required preserving the defendant's right to trial only upon payment into court of the Hong Kong dollar equivalent of JPY 42,560,000 (as determined by HSBC mid-market rate on the date of judgment) within 30 days or by providing security to a Master's satisfaction.
Court Disposition
Master's order of 5 December 2005 set aside; conditional leave to defend granted subject to payment into court or provision of security; liberty to apply; costs reserved (nisi) with specific costs directions.
Orders
- Master's order dated 5 December 2005 set aside
- Leave to defend granted on condition that Mr Lam pays into court within 30 days an amount in Hong Kong dollars equal to JPY 42,560,000 as determined by HSBC mid-market rate on date of judgment, or otherwise gives security to the satisfaction of a Master
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment