PACIFIC ELECTRIC WIRE & CABLE CO LTD v. TEXAN MANAGEMENT LTD AND OTHERS

PACIFIC ELECTRIC WIRE & CABLE CO LTD v. TEXAN MANAGEMENT LTD AND OTHERS

Leave to appeal was dismissed because the Court found sufficiently triable issues concerning the plaintiff's proprietary claims against the corporate defendants, making the matter unsuitable for summary judgment under Order 14; the Court also declined to grant leave on the costs point as it involved the Court of Appeal's discretionary exercise in the peculiar circumstances of overturned summary judgment.

Citation
PACIFIC ELECTRIC WIRE & CABLE CO LTD v. TEXAN MANAGEMENT LTD AND OTHERS
Parties
Applicant/plaintiff: Pacific Electric Wire & Cable Company Limited; 1st Defendant/respondent: Harmutty Limited; Individual Defendant/respondent: Hu Hung Chiu; Defendant/respondent: Gold Global Limited; Defendant/respondent: Texan Management Limited; Corporate Defendant/respondent: All Dragon International Limited
Court
Court of Final Appeal
Jurisdiction
Hong Kong
Judgment Date
14 September 2009
Case Number
FAMV29/2009
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Proceedings Application for Leave to Appeal / Determination on Leave to Appeal (dismissed)
Outcome
Application for leave to appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Order 14 Summary Judgment, Fraud Exception to Summary Judgment, Proprietary Remedies, Leave to Appeal
Source Language
EN

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 10 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Pacific Electric Wire & Cable Company Limited

Applicant/plaintiff

Harmutty Limited

1st Defendant/respondent

Hu Hung Chiu

Individual Defendant/respondent

Gold Global Limited

Defendant/respondent

Texan Management Limited

Defendant/respondent

All Dragon International Limited

Corporate Defendant/respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Proceedings Application for Leave to Appeal / Determination on Leave to Appeal (dismissed)

  1. 1 Whether Order 14 r 1(2)(b) excludes summary judgment where the plaintiff's proprietary claim involves allegations of fraud against directors
  2. 2 Whether the fraud exception in Order 14 applies only to common law deceit as defined in Derry v Peek
  3. 3 Whether the plaintiff's claims against corporate defendants raise triable issues making summary judgment inappropriate

Ratio Decidendi

Leave to appeal was dismissed because the Court found sufficiently triable issues concerning the plaintiff's proprietary claims against the corporate defendants, making the matter unsuitable for summary judgment under Order 14; the Court also declined to grant leave on the costs point as it involved the Court of Appeal's discretionary exercise in the peculiar circumstances of overturned summary judgment.

Court Disposition

Application for leave to appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Application for leave to appeal dismissed
  • Order nisi that the applicant pay the costs of the respondents