TONG HOK TAK, DAFFY AND OTHERS v. BEVERLY CONSULTANTS LTD AND OTHERS
The summons was dismissed because the BVI legal opinions, although dated after 1 August 2003, did not constitute matters occurring since the order that went to the validity of the Order as required by Order 45 r11; furthermore discretionary factors — imminent appeal hearing, absence of explanation for not producing the opinions earlier, and that the defendants' objections related to implementation rather than substance — warranted refusing a stay.
- Citation
- TONG HOK TAK, DAFFY AND OTHERS v. BEVERLY CONSULTANTS LTD AND OTHERS
- Parties
- 1st Plaintiff: Tong Hok Tak, Daffy; 2nd Plaintiff: Cheung Look Ping, Ophelia; 3rd Plaintiff: Golden Valley Agents Limited; 1st Defendant: Beverly Consultants Limited; 2nd Defendant: Leong Wing Jann, Alvin (also known as Alvin Leong); 3rd Defendant: Star World International Limited
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 21 October 2003
- Case Number
- HCA2617/2003
- Procedural Posture
- Interlocutory Application for Stay Under Order 45 Rule 11 (civil) / Chambers Decision on Summons for Interim Stay of Execution of Interlocutory Injunction/order
- Outcome
- The 1st and 2nd defendants' summons dated 16 October 2003 is dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Order 45 Rule 11, Stay of Execution, Authority of Company to Sue, Ratification, Fresh Legal Opinions
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Tong Hok Tak, Daffy
1st Plaintiff
Cheung Look Ping, Ophelia
2nd Plaintiff
Golden Valley Agents Limited
3rd Plaintiff
Beverly Consultants Limited
1st Defendant
Leong Wing Jann, Alvin (also known as Alvin Leong)
2nd Defendant
Star World International Limited
3rd Defendant
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Application for Stay Under Order 45 Rule 11 (civil) / Chambers Decision on Summons for Interim Stay of Execution of Interlocutory Injunction/order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether legal opinions obtained after the order constitute 'matters which have occurred since the date of the order' under Order 45 r11
- 2 Whether the new BVI legal opinions affect the validity of the interlocutory Order of 1 August 2003
- 3 Whether Golden Valley Agents Limited had authority to bring proceedings and whether lack of authority undermines the Order
Ratio Decidendi
The summons was dismissed because the BVI legal opinions, although dated after 1 August 2003, did not constitute matters occurring since the order that went to the validity of the Order as required by Order 45 r11; furthermore discretionary factors — imminent appeal hearing, absence of explanation for not producing the opinions earlier, and that the defendants' objections related to implementation rather than substance — warranted refusing a stay.
Court Disposition
The 1st and 2nd defendants' summons dated 16 October 2003 is dismissed.
Orders
- Summons dated 16 October 2003 dismissed.
- Costs to the plaintiffs against the 1st and 2nd defendants, to be taxed if not agreed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment