YAO GUOLIANG AND ANOTHER v. FOREVER WINNER INTERNTIONAL LTD AND OTHERS
On an objective construction of the Undertaking and its context, "assets" did not include mere physical share certificates; the mere movement of those certificates from the UBS account without more did not constitute dealing with Forever Winner's assets and therefore did not breach the Undertaking or render Wang's affirmation false; accordingly the ex parte Order 52 leave was set aside and the committal (contempt) proceedings dismissed.
- Citation
- [2026] HKCFI 1146
- Parties
- 1st Plaintiff: Yao Guoliang; 2nd Plaintiff: Jin Yao Holdings Limited; 1st Defendant: Forever Winner International Limited; 2nd Defendant: Wang Jian Sheng; 3rd Defendant: Sino Century Holdings Limited; 4th Defendant: Yongling Xia
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 2 March 2026
- Case Number
- HCMP2442/2024
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Committal for Contempt Arising From Undertakings Given in Section 21 M High Court Ordinance Proceedings; Challenge to Order 52 Leave / Decision on Set Aside Summons to Set Aside Ex Parte Order 52 Leave (interlocutory Hearing, Leave Set Aside and Proceedings Dismissed)
- Outcome
- Order 52 leave set aside; contempt proceedings dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Order 52 Leave, Committal Proceedings, Full and Frank Disclosure (ex Parte), Construction of Undertakings, Meaning of "assets" in Undertakings, Proportionality in Enforcement
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Yao Guoliang
1st Plaintiff
Jin Yao Holdings Limited
2nd Plaintiff
Forever Winner International Limited
1st Defendant
Wang Jian Sheng
2nd Defendant
Sino Century Holdings Limited
3rd Defendant
Yongling Xia
4th Defendant
Procedural Posture
Application for Committal for Contempt Arising From Undertakings Given in Section 21 M High Court Ordinance Proceedings; Challenge to Order 52 Leave / Decision on Set Aside Summons to Set Aside Ex Parte Order 52 Leave (interlocutory Hearing, Leave Set Aside and Proceedings Dismissed)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether "assets" in the Undertaking included mere physical share certificates held in bank custody
- 2 Whether the movement of the share certificates constituted "dealing with assets" and breached the Undertaking
- 3 Whether Wang made a false statement on oath in the affirmation filed in pursuance of the Undertaking
Ratio Decidendi
On an objective construction of the Undertaking and its context, "assets" did not include mere physical share certificates; the mere movement of those certificates from the UBS account without more did not constitute dealing with Forever Winner's assets and therefore did not breach the Undertaking or render Wang's affirmation false; accordingly the ex parte Order 52 leave was set aside and the committal (contempt) proceedings dismissed.
Court Disposition
Order 52 leave set aside; contempt proceedings dismissed
Orders
- Order 52 leave granted ex parte set aside
- Contempt Proceedings (HCMP 2297/2025) dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment