T AND ANOTHER v. N AND OTHERS
The court granted an extension of time under s12(2) having regard to the welfare of the child and the short delay; it construed 'home' in s12(3)(a) flexibly and concluded on the facts that the child’s home was with the applicants despite the child remaining in Georgia; it authorized retrospective approval of the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2022] HKCFI 747
- Parties
- 1st Applicant: T; 2nd Applicant: L; 1st Respondent: N; 2nd Respondent: R; 3rd Respondent: The Minor (through his guardian ad litem The Official Solicitor)
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 16 March 2022
- Case Number
- HCMP797/2021
- Procedural Posture
- Parental Order Application Under Section 12 Parent and Child Ordinance (surrogacy) / Judgment and Directions; Final Hearing Adjourned Pending Supplemental Reports
- Outcome
- Originating summons adjourned for short substantive hearing after supplemental reports; time extended; retrospective authorization of surrogacy payments granted; finding that child's home was with applicants; final parental order deferred pending supplemental assessment.
- Legal Topics
- Parental Order, Section 12 PCO, Home Requirement, Time Extension, Authorization of Surrogacy Payments, Social Investigation Report, Best Interests of the Child, Service Out of Jurisdiction, Foreign Law Evidence
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
T
1st Applicant
L
2nd Applicant
N
1st Respondent
R
2nd Respondent
The Minor (through his guardian ad litem The Official Solicitor)
3rd Respondent
Procedural Posture
Parental Order Application Under Section 12 Parent and Child Ordinance (surrogacy) / Judgment and Directions; Final Hearing Adjourned Pending Supplemental Reports
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether time should be extended under s12(2) PCO for filing the parental order application
- 2 Whether s12(3)(a) requirement that the child’s home be with the applicants (or either of them) was satisfied when the child remained abroad
- 3 Whether payments made for the surrogacy arrangements should be authorised under s12(7) PCO
Ratio Decidendi
The court granted an extension of time under s12(2) having regard to the welfare of the child and the short delay; it construed 'home' in s12(3)(a) flexibly and concluded on the facts that the child’s home was with the applicants despite the child remaining in Georgia; it authorized retrospective approval of the surrogacy payments under s12(7) as reasonable in the circumstances and without evidence of moral taint or public policy abuse; however the court adjourned final determination and directed that the child be brought to Hong Kong so the social work officer and Official Solicitor can physically observe the child with the applicants and file supplemental reports, the welfare of the...
Court Disposition
Originating summons adjourned for short substantive hearing after supplemental reports; time extended; retrospective authorization of surrogacy payments granted; finding that child's home was with applicants; final parental order deferred pending supplemental assessment.
Orders
- Extend time for filing under s12(2) PCO and proceed with merits determination
- Retrospective authorization and approval of surrogacy payments totalling USD 52,575
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment