CWG v. MH AND OTHERS

CWG v. MH AND OTHERS

Having found Hong Kong the appropriate forum, and after assessing credibility and documentary evidence, the court concluded the husband had failed to make full and frank disclosure and controlled and held beneficial interests in numerous Hong Kong and offshore companies and in tangible collections. Dispositions of shares by the husband within three years preceding the application were presumed to be intended to defeat the wife’s claim under s29AJ and the husband did not rebut that presumption; the court set aside specified transfers to offshore vehicles, found the husband beneficially interested (including a 50% attribution in key offshore entities and a one‑third interest in the...

Citation
CWG v. MH AND OTHERS
Parties
Applicant (wife): CWG; 1st Respondent (husband): MH; 2nd Respondent (husband's Mother R2): WH; 3rd Respondent (mvf Foundation): MVF LIMITED; 4th Respondent (husband's Brother): WM; 5th Respondent (husband's Father R5): EH; 6th Respondent (r5's Company R6): LS LIMITED; 7th Respondent (husband's Sister): BM
Court
Court of First Instance
Jurisdiction
Hong Kong
Judgment Date
26 March 2013
Case Number
HCMP643/2012
Procedural Posture
Part IIA Application Under Matrimonial Proceedings and Property Ordinance (ancillary Financial Relief After Foreign Divorce) / Full Trial and Judgment (court of First Instance, Judgment Handed Down)
Outcome
Part IIA application allowed in part. Court set aside specified dispositions, awarded capital and maintenance to applicant, dismissed husband’s variation summons, granted implementation/transfer undertakings and costs orders against husband and R2 jointly and severally (see orders).
Legal Topics
Part IIA MPPO Jurisdiction (s29 Af), Setting Aside Dispositions S29 AJ, Nuptial Agreements and Weight (radmacher), Beneficial Ownership of Corporate Assets, Piercing Corporate Veil, Disclosure and Subpoenas, Valuation and Enforcement, Variation of Interim Maintenance Orders
Source Language
EN
Family Law Matrimonial Finance Trusts Company Law Private International Law Civil Procedure Part IIA MPPO Jurisdiction (s29 Af) Setting Aside Dispositions S29 AJ +6 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 6 Authorities cited 13 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 6
Sign in to unlock

Parties

CWG

Applicant (wife)

MH

1st Respondent (husband)

WH

2nd Respondent (husband's Mother R2)

MVF LIMITED

3rd Respondent (mvf Foundation)

WM

4th Respondent (husband's Brother)

EH

5th Respondent (husband's Father R5)

LS LIMITED

6th Respondent (r5's Company R6)

BM

7th Respondent (husband's Sister)

Procedural Posture

Part IIA Application Under Matrimonial Proceedings and Property Ordinance (ancillary Financial Relief After Foreign Divorce) / Full Trial and Judgment (court of First Instance, Judgment Handed Down)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether Hong Kong was appropriate forum to grant financial relief under Part IIA MPPO
  2. 2 Validity and effect of the missing pre-nuptial agreement
  3. 3 Date of separation and duration of marriage for s7 exercise

Ratio Decidendi

Having found Hong Kong the appropriate forum, and after assessing credibility and documentary evidence, the court concluded the husband had failed to make full and frank disclosure and controlled and held beneficial interests in numerous Hong Kong and offshore companies and in tangible collections. Dispositions of shares by the husband within three years preceding the application were presumed to be intended to defeat the wife’s claim under s29AJ and the husband did not rebut that presumption; the court set aside specified transfers to offshore vehicles, found the husband beneficially interested (including a 50% attribution in key offshore entities and a one‑third interest in the...

Court Disposition

Part IIA application allowed in part. Court set aside specified dispositions, awarded capital and maintenance to applicant, dismissed husband’s variation summons, granted implementation/transfer undertakings and costs orders against husband and R2 jointly and severally (see orders).

Orders

  • Husband to pay applicant lump sum HK$120,000,000 within 3 months
  • Set aside husband’s dispositions (to AC Oversea (BVI)) of shares registered in his name in the following companies: 3 shares in WS (HK); 2 shares in AC Ltd; 2 shares in AC International; 2 shares in AC International Property; 2 shares in AC International Video; 2 shares in AC International Holdings; 1 share in F & B...